Dnia 2011-03-10, czw o godzinie 14:28 +1300, Michael Hope pisze:
Linaro GCC is already available in a bunch of places including
OpenBricks, crosstool-NG, OpenEmbedded, OpenWRT, and (of course)
Ubuntu. I hope to write a short page on each so people know where to
find our toolchain in the
On 9 March 2011 19:15, Tom Gall tom.g...@linaro.org wrote:
Going deeper it's pretty easy to spot low hanging fruit:
From fs - Do we need afs, jfs, code, minix, hpfs, xfs, hfs, hfsplus,
gfs2, reiserfs... I'm thinking no.
From drivers - net and media make about about 1/3rd of the 28 meg in
Ubuntu/natty got some cross toolchain updates recently so it is
installable again. This gave me some free time to work on improvements.
And this mail is an attempt to summary it and to provide some
ideas/questions.
= Introduction =
During Emdebian sprint it was decided that my source packages
On 9 March 2011 15:35, Meng-Hsuan Cheng l...@0xlab.org wrote:
Add linaro-build.sh to support linaro android toolchain.
Merged (along with slight syntax tweak) in GIT:
http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=android/platform/build.git;a=summary
Thanks for your contribution.
Sincerely,
-jserv
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
=== wait_device testing ===
* On reader #1, consistently fails with 30 seconds timeout
* On reader #2, very likely succeeds after 2 seconds (5 out of 6
iterations), (fails with 30 seconds timeout on the 6th iteration)
* On reader #3, consistently
Hi,
CCed updated Michal email address,
One note, As Michal moved to google, Marek is works on CMA. We are
also studying the hwmem and GEM.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 9:18 PM, johan.xx.mossb...@stericsson.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
The following patchset implements a
On 9 March 2011 20:56, Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org wrote:
We currently use a feature branch / merge request / merge / test /
push approach in gcc-linaro. This works fine for a reasonable cost
but can mean that patches sit unreviewed and unmerged for up to a
month. Ramana, Andrew,
Hi,
2011/3/10 Marcin Juszkiewicz marcin.juszkiew...@linaro.org:
= Problems =
Main problem is debian/packaging/ directory in Debian version. I need
review of [4] patch and then will report a bug against eglibc.
It probably runs fine under bash, but not under dash/sh.
4. http://42.pl/u/2zj4
On Monday 07 March 2011, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Monday 07 March 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile
index 0d43be9..540697e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile
@@ -18,3 +18,4 @@
Hello,
On Tuesday, March 08, 2011 9:14 AM Hans Verkuil wrote:
We had a discussion yesterday regarding ways in which linaro can assist
V4L2 development. One topic was that of sorting out memory providers like
GEM and HWMEM.
Today I learned of yet another one: UMP from ARM.
On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 13:15:25 -0600, Tom Gall tom.g...@linaro.org wrote:
2) Linaro-media-create shouldn't install linux-firmware_1.47_all.deb ?
Do we have any any hardware that needs it? If so could there be a
--nano option to not install it?
This is currently in the hwpacks as linux-image-*
On 10/03/11 at 09:20am, James Westby wrote:
On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 13:15:25 -0600, Tom Gall tom.g...@linaro.org wrote:
3) linaro-media-create should have some kind of option (--nano) to
clear out apt caches (saves ~40 meg of space)
If you want this it should be an easy change to make.
If its
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 03:14:11PM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
Hello,
On Tuesday, March 08, 2011 9:14 AM Hans Verkuil wrote:
We had a discussion yesterday regarding ways in which linaro can assist
V4L2 development. One topic was that of sorting out memory providers like
GEM and
Hi
In the developer platforms team we're working on getting the
linaro-nano image so that it is considerably smaller.
Brilliant!
Some highlights to nano:
* The linaro-image boots just as our linaro-headless image did
(upstart and friends)
* it can be updated, or additional pkgs
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011, Tom Gall wrote:
Specifically from the installed image after the hwpack deps are
installed get rid of the following:
rm -f ./var/lib/apt/lists/*Packages
rm -f ./var/lib/apt/lists/*Sources
rm -f ./var/lib/apt/lists/*Release
rm -f ./var/lib/apt/lists/*Release.gpg
rm -f
Dnia 2011-03-10, czw o godzinie 17:43 +0100, Loïc Minier pisze:
I think there is a way for APT to keep compressed versions of these
files; it's the Acquire::GzipIndexes option
And all those files can be recreated by APT when needed so there is no
need to keep them in image which has to be
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 09:56:12AM +, David Gilbert wrote:
1) Is there agreement that for all the kernels we supply that we
should change the policy for kernel configs to not default to
everything on?
(Maybe we should be using the upstream config with minimal modifications?)
Pro:
Hi,
This is a message sent out once per week to call on our community to
help test the Linaro evaluation builds we produce. If you have supported
hardware, as found on:
http://snapshots.linaro.org/11.05-daily/linaro-hwpacks/
please help our initiative by testing:
Ubuntu Desktop:
+++ Tom Gall [2011-03-09 13:15 -0600]:
From sound - ac97, are there arm boards that use that?
Some do. I know pxa270-based boards do. I don't know about new, shiny
linaro v7-vintage stuff.
So that said, what is the best way to proceed?
1) Is there agreement that for all the kernels we
Enclosed you'll find a link to the agenda, minutes, actions and IRC logs
from the
Linaro kernel working group weekly meetings of March 07, 2011.
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/KernelConsolidation/Meetings/2011-03-07
== Summary ==
* Bug reviews
* Google Summer of code
* Patches
Enclosed you'll find a link to the agenda, minutes and actions from the
Linaro toolchain working group weekly meetings of March 07 March 09,
2011.
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/Meetings/2011-03-07
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/Meetings/2011-03-09
==
From: Rob Herring rob.herr...@calxeda.com
Add a make rule to compile dt blobs for ARM.
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring rob.herr...@calxeda.com
---
arch/arm/Makefile |3 +++
arch/arm/boot/Makefile |6 ++
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/Makefile
The U-Boot on gitorious is more of a nostalgia piece, we actually
abandoned the repo a long time ago.
I am recommending this, and hoping Linaro stick to it: Linaro, Ubuntu,
Debian or any concerned distribution has absolutely NO business
building or flashing U-Boot for the boards.
You do not need
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 18:57 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011, Anand Gadiyar wrote:
@Nicolas,
None of these have been queued up by the respective maintainers yet,
so they aren't in linux-next as of today. However I believe there are
no outstanding review comments for
John,
It should work with linux-linaro-2.6.38 with the correct config. Make
sure to turn off CONFIG_OMAP2_DSS_SDI as it cause a access fault. See
lp:720055.
John
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 5:51 PM, john stultz johns...@us.ibm.com wrote:
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 18:57 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
Thanks. Amit.
2011/3/9 Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org:
On 09/03/11 02:44, Barry Song wrote:
Thanks. Amit.
2011/3/8 Amit Kucheria amit.kuche...@linaro.org:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Barry Song 21cn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Lee,
Great! Thanks a lot. It looks like the communication
Hi, Arnd,
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de wrote:
On Monday 07 March 2011, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Monday 07 March 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile
index 0d43be9..540697e 100644
---
Hi Jason,
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 12:59:42PM +0800, Jason Liu wrote:
Signed-off-by: Jason Liu jason@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Jason Liu r64...@freescale.com
Singed-off-by: Rob Herring robherri...@gmail.com
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/babbage.dts | 122
Hi, Shawn,
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Shawn Guo shawn@freescale.com wrote:
Hi Jason,
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 12:59:42PM +0800, Jason Liu wrote:
Signed-off-by: Jason Liu jason@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Jason Liu r64...@freescale.com
Singed-off-by: Rob Herring
29 matches
Mail list logo
