On 29 March 2011 06:34, Jim Huang jim.hu...@linaro.org wrote:
GCC 4.5 and up supports graphite optimization, and cloog and ppl
are required. This change attempts to support some combinations
of ppl and cloog/cloog-ppl libraries. Since cloog and ppl are
written in C++, it implies we might
Previously, the optimized asm option is only enabled when
__ARM_ARCH_5E__ is defined, which is assigned in armv5te.mk
rather than armv7-a series targets. This patch checks the ARM CPU
feature about half-word multiply instructions to enable ARMv5TE
resampler optimization routines properly.
Code
On 30 March 2011 15:07, Luse Cheng l...@0xlab.org wrote:
Integrate Linaro-GDB in Android toolchain build system
---
linaro-build.sh | 126
++
1 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
Thanks! Merged in Linaro HEAD.
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 8:49 PM, Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@free.frwrote:
On 04/05/2011 10:28 AM, yong.s...@linaro.org wrote:
From: Yong Shenyong.s...@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Yong Shenyong.s...@linaro.org
---
clocks.c | 54
+-
On 04/05/2011 10:28 AM, yong.s...@linaro.org wrote:
From: Yong Shenyong.s...@linaro.org
everytime when screen refresh, the clock_info data stucture will
be reacclocated, which does not make sence. This patch addresses
this issue.
Signed-off-by: Yong Shenyong.s...@linaro.org
Hi Yong,
I tried
Hi Daniel,
It runs well on my board so far.
I will try to do more test to reproduce it. Meanwhile, could you please
print your clock tree for me? Using 'powerdebug -cvd'.
Cheers
Yong
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@free.frwrote:
On 04/05/2011 10:28 AM,
On Wed, 6 Apr 2011, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Amit Kucheria amit.kuche...@linaro.org writes:
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 6:21 AM, Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pi...@linaro.org
wrote:
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, Vishwanath Sripathy wrote:
Hi Nicolas,
Pls find rebased OMAP DVFS patches attached. Apologies
Enclosed you'll find a link to the agenda, notes and actions from the
Linaro Developer Platforms Weekly Status meeting held on April 6th
in #linaro-meeting on irc.freenode.net at 15:00 UTC.
https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/DevPlatform/Meetings/2011-04-06
Actions from the meeting where as
Previously there has only been one function mmc_wait_for_req
to start and wait for a request. This patch adds
* mmc_start_req - starts a request wihtout waiting
* mmc_wait_for_req_done - waits until request is done
* mmc_pre_req - asks the host driver to prepare for the next job
* mmc_post_req
Add four tests for read and write performance per
different transfer size, 4k to 4M.
* Read using blocking mmc request
* Read using none blocking mmc request
* Write using blocking mmc request
* Write using none blocking mmc request
The host dirver must support pre_req() and post_req()
in
The way the request data is organized in the mmc queue struct
it only allows processing of one request at the time.
This patch adds a new struct to hold mmc queue request data such as
sg list, request, blk request and bounce buffers, and updates any functions
depending on the mmc queue struct.
Break out code from mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq to create a
block request prepare function. This doesn't change
any functionallity. This helps when handling more
than one active block request.
Signed-off-by: Per Forlin per.for...@linaro.org
---
drivers/mmc/card/block.c | 170
Break out code without functional changes. This simplifies the code and
makes way for handle two parallel request.
Signed-off-by: Per Forlin per.for...@linaro.org
---
drivers/mmc/card/block.c | 225 +++---
1 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 93
pre_req() runs dma_map_sg() post_req() runs dma_unmap_sg.
If not calling pre_req() before omap_hsmmc_request(), request()
will prepare the cache just like it did it before.
It is optional to use pre_req() and post_req().
Signed-off-by: Per Forlin per.for...@linaro.org
---
This simple fault injection proved to be very useful to
test the error handling in the block.c rw_rq(). It may
still be useful to test if the host driver handle
pre_req() and post_req() correctly in case of errors.
Signed-off-by: Per Forlin per.for...@linaro.org
---
drivers/mmc/core/core.c|
Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pi...@linaro.org writes:
On Wed, 6 Apr 2011, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Amit Kucheria amit.kuche...@linaro.org writes:
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 6:21 AM, Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pi...@linaro.org
wrote:
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, Vishwanath Sripathy wrote:
Hi Nicolas,
Pls
I have the same problem. If I turn off the display then the board boots.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-linaro-omap/+bug/752900
Thanks to John Stultz for making the connection that the hang was just as
the display gets set up on a successful boot.
Kernel config and boot logs
On 04/06/2011 03:28 PM, Yong Shen wrote:
Hi Daniel,
It runs well on my board so far.
I have an igep v2.
I will try to do more test to reproduce it. Meanwhile, could you please
print your clock tree for me? Using 'powerdebug -cvd'.
Sure here it is, I put the result of the 'tree' command
Hi Paul,
There is a bug for it in launchpad. It was created as a private bug.
Angus
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Paul Larson paul.lar...@linaro.org wrote:
Is there a bug for this in launchpad yet? I see this hang on the
board we have in the validation lab too, and it's especially annoying
Hi Linaro folks,
I'd like to set up an automated testing environment to help me maintain
the MMC subsystem: just a few boards of different architectures booting
each day's linux-next and running basic performance and integrity tests
without any manual intervention involved. I've got access to
Hi Chris, we actually have a project in progress called LAVA to do something
very similar to this. Our initial target is to test full linaro images and
hardware packs, however we are also very interested in extending this to
include running with just an updated kernel in a known good image to
21 matches
Mail list logo
