On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 06:53:50PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> Hey
>
> If you try latest daily hwpacks + latest linaro-image-tools (0.4.4 or
> bzr) you should be getting Device Tree aware images for boards which
> support it (mostly i.MX51 and OMAP ATM).
>
> Feedback and bug reports w
>> What else? I know one issue maybe why does this need to exist when
>> other solutions exist. I think that since Android uses it, it is
>> somewhat of a de facto standard.
>
> Oh. Android uses it. It must be The Right Thing (TM), then, I guess.
> Probably like some of the Linux kernel code they
Dear John Rigby,
In message you wrote:
>
> > If you are discussing requirements for U-Boot, and plan to get these
> > merged in to mainlineU-Boot one day, it would probably be a good idea
> > to discuss these plans on the U-Boot mailing list as well - ideally
> > before any design is cast in iron
On 04/21/2011 07:08 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
make ARCH=arm defconfig
cat arch/arm/configs/omap4_defconfig>>.config
make ARCH=arm oldnoconfig
make omap4_defconfig
Wow that is a lot simpler... if you know it.
When trying to figure this out I googled the
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011, Andy Green wrote:
> On 04/21/2011 07:08 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
>
> > > >make ARCH=arm defconfig
> > > >cat arch/arm/configs/omap4_defconfig>>.config
> > > >make ARCH=arm oldnoconfig
> >
> > make omap4_defconfig
>
> Wow that is a lot s
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011, Andy Green wrote:
> On 04/20/2011 11:20 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
>
> Hi -
>
> > I noticed this commit:
> >
> > This introduces a defconfig version of Sebastien Jan's reference
> > config for Panda.
> >
> > To use the defconfig, you need to use the fol
Hey
If you try latest daily hwpacks + latest linaro-image-tools (0.4.4 or
bzr) you should be getting Device Tree aware images for boards which
support it (mostly i.MX51 and OMAP ATM).
Feedback and bug reports welcome!
Cheers,
--
Loïc Minier
__
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Grant Likely
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Chris Ball wrote:
>> Hi David,
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 07 2011, David Gilbert wrote:
>>> I'm curious; do we have any interaction with the autotest project
>>> - it seems it's whole point is automated kernel testing,
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Thu, Apr 07 2011, David Gilbert wrote:
>> I'm curious; do we have any interaction with the autotest project
>> - it seems it's whole point is automated kernel testing,.
>> http://autotest.kernel.org/ and test.kernel.org
>
> test.
On 04/21/2011 10:20 AM, Andy Green wrote:
> On 04/21/2011 05:07 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
>
> Hi -
>
>>> I have a Beagle XM, but l-m-c breaks here writing to a real SD card
>>> and the
>>> alternative method (3G image) takes several hours from the ubuntu vm
>>> I am
>>> runni
On 04/21/2011 05:07 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
Hi -
I have a Beagle XM, but l-m-c breaks here writing to a real SD card and the
alternative method (3G image) takes several hours from the ubuntu vm I am
running it from. I plan to meddle with that some more today.
What is l
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 2:29 AM, Andy Green wrote:
> On 04/20/2011 11:20 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
>
> Hi -
>
>> I noticed this commit:
>>
>> This introduces a defconfig version of Sebastien Jan's reference
>> config for Panda.
>>
>> To use the defconfig, you need to use the f
Enclosed you'll find a link to the agenda, minutes and actions from the
Linaro Toolchain working group weekly meetings of April 18 & 21, 2011.
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/Meetings/2011-04-18
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/Meetings/2011-04-21
== Summary ==
On behalf of the Linaro Infrastructure team I'm pleased to announce the
release of Linaro Image Tools 0.4.4.
Linaro Image Tools offer a set of tools for use with Linaro images.
Highlights of this release:
* Support for EfikaMX boards has been added
* Support for i.MX53 LOCO board has been added
Enclosed you'll find a link to the agenda, minutes, actions and IRC logs
from the
Linaro kernel working group weekly meetings of April 18, 2011.
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Kernel/Meetings/2011-04-18
== Summary ==
* Went over the cycle 11.11 Technical Requirements ownership and estimat
Hi,
notes and actions from our Wednesday graphics working group call are
available on the wiki:
+ https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Graphics/Notes/2011-04-20
Details about when and where of this meeting can be found here:
+
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Grap
> > > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> >
> > Just to be sure: Did you double-check if the original licenses were v2
> > or v2+?
> >
> It seems to me that sdhci-cns3xxx.c, sdhci-dove.c, sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> and sdhci-tegra.c all use v2.
>
> Actually I do not even know how v2+ is stated. Do you have a
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 12:21:10PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > config MMC_SDHCI_ESDHC_IMX
> > - bool "SDHCI platform support for the Freescale eSDHC i.MX controller"
> > + bool "SDHCI support for the Freescale eSDHC i.MX controller"
> > depends on ARCH_MX25 || ARCH_MX35 || ARCH_MX5
> >
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 12:21:01PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
> > +static int __devinit sdhci_esdhc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct sdhci_host *host;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + host = sdhci_pltfm_init(pdev, &sdhci_esdhc_pdata);
> > + if (!host)
> > + ret
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 12:20:53PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 04:48:48PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > The patch is to migrate the use of sdhci_of_host and sdhci_of_data
> > to sdhci_pltfm_host and sdhci_pltfm_data, so that the former pair can
> > be eliminated.
> >
> > Sig
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 12:20:42PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 04:48:47PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > The patch turns the common stuff in sdhci-pltfm.c into functions, and
> > add device drivers their own .probe and .remove which in turn call
> > into the common function
Hi Wolfram,
Thanks for the review.
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 12:20:31PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
[...]
> The approach seems sensible, so have a look at my (mostly minor)
> comments inside the patches. However, there is one bigger piece missing.
> You converted all the drivers which had a seperate
SMDKV310 board is based on Samsung S5PV310 SOC. This SOC is very much
similar to S5PC210.
Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap
Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera
---
Changes for v2:
- Coding Style Cleanup
- Removed unwanted macros from board config file.
- Ethernet controllor configu
Added MMC SPL boot support for SMDKV310. This framework design is
based on nand_spl support.
Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap
---
Makefile|9 ++
spl/board/samsung/smdkv310/Makefile | 103 +++
spl/board/samsung/smdkv310/mm
Hi,
This patchset adds support for a new board SMDKV310, based on S5PV310 SOC.
This SOC is very similar to S5PC210 SOC, hence we are re-using this SOC code.
Specific changes in PATCH v2 are mention in specific patch files.
Chander Kashyap (2):
ARMV7: Add support for Samsung SMDKV310 Board
ARM
25 matches
Mail list logo
