Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] cpufreq: add clk-reg cpufreq driver

2011-12-26 Thread Mark Brown
On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 11:52:29PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote: On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 01:42:29PM +, Mark Brown wrote: On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 09:28:33PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote: If you think regulator thansition latency is board specific, then the board dts can overrite it.

Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] cpufreq: add clk-reg cpufreq driver

2011-12-26 Thread Richard Zhao
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 11:10:30AM +, Mark Brown wrote: On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 11:52:29PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote: On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 01:42:29PM +, Mark Brown wrote: On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 09:28:33PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote: If you think regulator thansition latency

Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] cpufreq: add clk-reg cpufreq driver

2011-12-26 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 09:44:52PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote: On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 11:10:30AM +, Mark Brown wrote: Fix your mailer to word wrap properly please. The *call* is there in the regulator subsystem, it's just that none of the drivers back it up with an actual implementation

Linaro Android GB vs ICS bugs

2011-12-26 Thread Andy Green
Hi - I visited https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-android to create a couple of bugs for Panda ICS rootfs [1], I was surprised to see 268 open bugs there including ones about Panda. When I looked at them, a lot are about Gingerbread, some are about TI LT kernels but others about Panda are