Hi All,
Final 12.03 RC's are available now (most of them boot tested as well).
I have updated QA sheets with build info for easy reference: (refer to Cell
V69 in respective QA sheets)
Please pick up builds as per your names, Testing process is already
mentioned by Zach (refer same mail).
Please l
Hi all!
The submission process for Linaro Connect Q2.12 plenaries is now open!
There will be 30 minutes of plenary talks daily from Tuesday through Friday
at Linaro Connect Q2.12 which is being held from 28 May - 1 June at the
Gold Coast Hotel in Hong Kong.
These plenary sessions will give Linar
So after talking about it at the last Linaro Connect, I've finally
gotten around to making a first pass at providing config fragments for
the linaro kernel. I'd like to propose merging this for 12.04, and
doing so early so we can make sure that all the desired config options
are present in
Hi Matt,
There is an application available on android which works on our boards with
google services package(android market and gmail apps).I am not aware of
any package available on ubuntu.
Regards,
Vishal
On 26 March 2012 20:41, Joey STANFORD wrote:
> I think Vishal was working on that so we
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 09:43:37AM -0600, Matt Waddel wrote:
> Does anybody know if google-talkplugin has been ported to ARM? This
> package is required to run Google Hangouts and there are proprietary
> libraries in the plugin that appear to be compiled for x86 only. I
> found some old references
I think Vishal was working on that so we could do hangouts on a member board.
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Matt Waddel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anybody know if google-talkplugin has been ported to ARM? This
> package is required to run Google Hangouts and there are proprietary
> libraries in the
If the state_count is not initialized for the device use
the driver's state count as the default. That will prevent
to add it manually in the cpuidle driver initialization
routine and will save us from duplicate line of code.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
---
drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c |2 +-
As far as I can see, this field is never used in the code.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
---
include/linux/cpuidle.h |1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/cpuidle.h b/include/linux/cpuidle.h
index f7f1d90..f3ebbba 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpuidl
All the modules name are ro-data, it is never copied to the array.
eg.
static struct cpuidle_driver intel_idle_driver = {
.name = "intel_idle",
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
};
It safe to assign the pointer of this ro-data to a const char *.
By this way we save 12 bytes.
Signed-off-by: