Hello,
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 09:53:15AM +0530, Amit Kachhap wrote:
> Hi Eduardo,
>
> On 3 April 2012 19:45, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 04:50:14PM +0530, Amit Kachhap wrote:
> >> On 23 February 2012 12:16, R, Durgadoss wrote:
> >> > Hi Amit,
> >> >
> >>
On 04/03/2012 03:59 PM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 14:51 +0530, Tushar Behera wrote:
>> For Samsung LT kernel, we have followed an approach where in the commits
>> in John's linaro_config_3.3 branch are taken to be stable commits and we
>> have put those commits as the very
Hi Len/Rui,
Any comment or feedback from your side about the status of this patch?
Is it merge-able or major re-work is needed? I have fixed most of the
comments in this patchset and currently working on some of the minor
comments received and will submit them shortly.
Regards,
Amit Daniel
On 19
Hi Eduardo,
On 3 April 2012 19:45, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 04:50:14PM +0530, Amit Kachhap wrote:
>> On 23 February 2012 12:16, R, Durgadoss wrote:
>> > Hi Amit,
>> >
>> >> -Original Message-
>> >> From: amit kachhap [mailto:amitdani...@gmail.com] On B
Greetings,
git.linaro.org supports scalable git clones over HTTP. This was done to
eliminate huge resources consumption by clones over GIT and "smart" HTTP
protocols by serving files directly with Apache server.
To clone read-only git tree use following link:
git clone http://git.linaro.org/*g
Hello,
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 04:50:14PM +0530, Amit Kachhap wrote:
> On 23 February 2012 12:16, R, Durgadoss wrote:
> > Hi Amit,
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: amit kachhap [mailto:amitdani...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Amit Daniel
> >> Kachhap
> >> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 20
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Ricardo Salveti
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Amit Kucheria
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Ricardo Salveti
So in the end we'd be generating 2 sets of hwpacks per board, one
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Ricardo Salveti
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Amit Kucheria
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Ricardo Salveti
>>> So in the end we'd be generating 2 sets of hwpacks per board, one
>>> based on the Development Overlay (latest components, even i
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Ricardo Salveti
>> So in the end we'd be generating 2 sets of hwpacks per board, one
>> based on the Development Overlay (latest components, even if not
>> working properly), and one based on the Stable PPAs, th
On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 18:43 +0800, Andy Green wrote:
> On 04/03/2012 06:29 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
> > I think it makes sense if this 'upstream' doesn't include board files
> > though, they should come from LT trees.
>
> Normally "board files" means mach-xyz/board*.c for me
On 04/03/2012 06:29 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
> On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 14:51 +0530, Tushar Behera wrote:
>> For Samsung LT kernel, we have followed an approach where in the commits
>> in John's linaro_config_3.3 branch are taken to be stable commits and we
>> have put those comm
On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 14:51 +0530, Tushar Behera wrote:
> For Samsung LT kernel, we have followed an approach where in the commits
> in John's linaro_config_3.3 branch are taken to be stable commits and we
> have put those commits as the very first set of commits on LT kernel.
> Our LT kernel being
On 04/03/2012 01:43 PM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 12:30 -0700, John Stultz wrote:
>> The difficulty is that as Tixy earlier pointed out, are that the LT
>> kernel trees are mainline based, and thus aren't based off of something
>> that would contain the base/distro/board
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Ricardo Salveti
wrote:
> Looking at the problem, here's what I think it'd help to fix the situation:
> 1 - Overlay PPA becomes the main repository for basic platform
> development, without having any hardware specific package (not even
> the kernel):
> This PPA w
On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 09:13 +0800, Andy Green wrote:
> On 04/03/2012 02:58 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
> > On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 11:18 -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> >> On 04/02/2012 10:29 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 08:37 -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> >
On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 12:30 -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> The difficulty is that as Tixy earlier pointed out, are that the LT
> kernel trees are mainline based, and thus aren't based off of something
> that would contain the base/distro/board config fragments.
>
> One approach we might be able to
16 matches
Mail list logo
