2012-09-19 Android Platform Team Meeting Agenda Posted

2012-09-18 Thread Zach Pfeffer
Take a look at: https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Android/Meetings/2012-09-19 Feel free to add to the agenda and join us in #linaro-meeting on irc.freenode.net at 13:00 UTC on 2012/9/19. -- Zach Pfeffer Android Platform Team Lead, Linaro Platform Teams Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM S

Re: fastmodel run over ubuntu 64bit machine

2012-09-18 Thread Andy Doan
On 09/17/2012 04:01 AM, Dave Pigott wrote: Hi Lei, I'm copying Andy Doan directly on this, since he's had more experience of getting FM working in LAVA and can probably point you in the right direction. Thanks Dave On 14 Sep 2012, at 14:35, Lei Wen wrote: Hi Dave, On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 3

Re: [PATCH 0/6] cpuidle : per cpu latencies

2012-09-18 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, September 18, 2012, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:35:00PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > > On 09/17/2012 10:50 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Monday, September 17, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > > >> On 09/08/2012 12:17 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > >>>

Re: [PATCH 0/6] cpuidle : per cpu latencies

2012-09-18 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, September 17, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 09/17/2012 10:50 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Monday, September 17, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > >> On 09/08/2012 12:17 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >>> On Friday, September 07, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > Since commit 46bcf

Re: [PATCH v4 06/24] docs: Xen ARM DT bindings

2012-09-18 Thread Dave Martin
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 03:12:11PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Mon, 17 Sep 2012, Rob Herring wrote: > > On 09/14/2012 09:26 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > On Fri, 14 Sep 2012, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > >> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 12:13:08PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > >

Re: [PATCH v5 00/17] Introduce Xen support on ARM (based on 3.6-rc5)

2012-09-18 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 02:57:05PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Tue, 18 Sep 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Monday 17 September 2012, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > > > I am also attaching to this email the dts'es that I am currently using > > > for dom0 and domU: vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1

Re: [PATCH v5 00/17] Introduce Xen support on ARM (based on 3.6-rc5)

2012-09-18 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 12:34:29PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday 17 September 2012, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > I am also attaching to this email the dts'es that I am currently using > > for dom0 and domU: vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1.dts (that includes > > vexpress-v2m-rs1-rtsm.dtsi) is th

Re: [PATCH v5 00/17] Introduce Xen support on ARM (based on 3.6-rc5)

2012-09-18 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday 17 September 2012, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > I am also attaching to this email the dts'es that I am currently using > > for dom0 and domU: vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1.dts (that includes > > vexpress-v2m-rs1-rtsm.dtsi) is the dts used for dom0 a

Re: [PATCH v5 00/17] Introduce Xen support on ARM (based on 3.6-rc5)

2012-09-18 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Monday 17 September 2012, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > I am also attaching to this email the dts'es that I am currently using > for dom0 and domU: vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1.dts (that includes > vexpress-v2m-rs1-rtsm.dtsi) is the dts used for dom0 and it is passed to > Linux by Xen, while vexpress-vi

Re: [PATCH 0/6] cpuidle : per cpu latencies

2012-09-18 Thread Peter De Schrijver
> > It is similar with Tegra3. > In our case CPU0 has different latencies for 1 C state compared to the other CPUs > I think Peter and Lorenzo already wrote a driver based on this approach. > Peter, Lorenzo any comments ? > Yes. My implementation doesn't provide a state table in the cpuidle d

Re: [PATCH 0/6] cpuidle : per cpu latencies

2012-09-18 Thread Lorenzo Pieralisi
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:35:00PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 09/17/2012 10:50 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Monday, September 17, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > >> On 09/08/2012 12:17 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >>> On Friday, September 07, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote: [...] > >>>

[PATCH 3/3] init: Add additional print for detailed kernel version

2012-09-18 Thread Tushar Behera
When CONFIG_LOCALVERSION_AUTO is not defined, kernel boot log prints only short version. This doesn't have any information regarding the commit at which the kernel was compiled. Adding an additional print statement to explicitly tell the current HEAD. Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera --- include/li

[PATCH 2/3] kbuild: Add support to extract information about current git commit HEAD

2012-09-18 Thread Tushar Behera
Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera --- Makefile |7 +-- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index 0f66f14..7e83768 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@ -374,6 +374,7 @@ KBUILD_LDFLAGS_MODULE := -T $(srctree)/scripts/module-common.lds # Read KE

[PATCH 0/3] kbuild modifications to print git commit ID

2012-09-18 Thread Tushar Behera
The bootlog in Ubuntu/Android images provide minimal information about the current HEAD from which the kernel was built. This patchset enables us to get detailed version info of the kernel. Tested both on Ubuntu and Android images. Patch 1 is already submitted to kernel-build ML and has been reje