Re: [Linaro-validation] IPv6

2012-12-10 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Alexander Sack writes: > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Dave Pigott wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I was just discussing IPv6 with Philip Colmer, our new IT Services Manager >> (cc'd on this mail), and it strikes me that we should at least be >> considering dual running at some point in the future,

Re: [RFC] cpuidle - remove the power_specified field in the driver

2012-12-10 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, December 10, 2012 11:09:58 AM Julius Werner wrote: > Hi, > > What is the current status of this? Daniel, do you think you have got > enough feedback to submit a definitive patch for this? Rafael, would > you approve of such a change? I need to talk to Len about that before I give you a

Re: [RFC] cpuidle - remove the power_specified field in the driver

2012-12-10 Thread Julius Werner
Hi, What is the current status of this? Daniel, do you think you have got enough feedback to submit a definitive patch for this? Rafael, would you approve of such a change? The bug with dynamically added C-states that is tied to this still hurts the battery life for some users across all distros

Re: [ANNOUNCE] linux-linaro kernel schedule for 12.12

2012-12-10 Thread Andrey Konovalov
Greetings, The 12.12 schedule has been updated on wiki: https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/DevPlatform/LinuxLinaroKernelSchedule Both the llct and the ll trees have been updated (see the wiki page for the details). There should be no more planned updates to llct for 12.12 release except movin

Android Team: Problems with Trying Jellybean on Panda

2012-12-10 Thread Amber Graner
Hi all - This question/support issue comes from comments posted by srinivasan in reference to the http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/2012/08/11/trying-linaro-jellybean-android-on-tis-panda-board/ post. Since it is the full error message - I didn't approve the comment but rather sent it to you a

Re: LAVA downtime

2012-12-10 Thread Dave Pigott
Hi all, After a process that wasn't as easy as I hoped, but not as bad as I feared, we now have v.l.o back up, and everything using 192.168.x.x/16 addresses. Now we can add Calxeda servers and the like to the mix and we won't run out of IP addresses for quite some time. I'll be happy to manage

Re: [PATCH] merge_config.sh: Add option to specify output dir

2012-12-10 Thread Andrey Konovalov
On 12/10/2012 06:51 PM, Zhangfei Gao wrote: On 10 December 2012 01:22, Michal Marek mailto:mma...@suse.cz>> wrote: On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 09:05:26AM -0800, John Stultz wrote: > On 12/02/2012 11:36 PM, Zhangfei Gao wrote: >> Provide a -O option to specify dir to put generated .c

[GIT PULL]; big LITTLE MP master v13

2012-12-10 Thread Viresh Kumar
[Already Pulled by Andrey] Hi Guys, This is an formal announcement of v13 release. Updates: - Created more branches with same stuff to keep topics separated. - Applied additional patch from Morten to task-placement-v2 branch --x-x The follow

Re: [PATCH] merge_config.sh: Add option to specify output dir

2012-12-10 Thread Zhangfei Gao
On 10 December 2012 01:22, Michal Marek wrote: > On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 09:05:26AM -0800, John Stultz wrote: > > On 12/02/2012 11:36 PM, Zhangfei Gao wrote: > >> Provide a -O option to specify dir to put generated .config > >> Then merge_config.sh does not need to be copied to target dir, > >> f

Fwd: IPv6 support [5405065:4109486]

2012-12-10 Thread Dave Pigott
Adding Philip this time. :) Begin forwarded message: > From: "Zen - Technical Support" > Subject: RE: IPv6 support [5405065:4109486] > Date: 10 December 2012 12:17:28 GMT > To: "Dave Pigott" > > Hello, > > The Zen core network has not yet had IPv6 turned on which would give you a > native IP

Fwd: IPv6 support [5405065:4109486]

2012-12-10 Thread Dave Pigott
FYI Begin forwarded message: > From: "Zen - Technical Support" > Subject: RE: IPv6 support [5405065:4109486] > Date: 10 December 2012 12:17:28 GMT > To: "Dave Pigott" > > Hello, > > The Zen core network has not yet had IPv6 turned on which would give you a > native IPv6 connection as yet. Al

Re: [Linaro-validation] IPv6

2012-12-10 Thread Alexander Sack
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Dave Pigott wrote: > Hi all, > > I was just discussing IPv6 with Philip Colmer, our new IT Services Manager > (cc'd on this mail), and it strikes me that we should at least be considering > dual running at some point in the future, i.e. providing both v4 and v6.

IPv6

2012-12-10 Thread Dave Pigott
Hi all, I was just discussing IPv6 with Philip Colmer, our new IT Services Manager (cc'd on this mail), and it strikes me that we should at least be considering dual running at some point in the future, i.e. providing both v4 and v6. I'm not clear what the ramifications are, or as yet whether Z