Re: AArch64 toolchain status

2014-01-29 Thread Ard Biesheuvel
On 30 January 2014 04:50, Anil Singhar wrote: > Does anyone know how to increase the disk size on Foundation Model? > > For some reason, the network connectivity to the foundation model (via ssh > localhost) doesn't work reliably. So my earlier attempts to mount my host > computer's drive and get

Test Result Summary of Linux Linaro ubuntu 14.01 Release.

2014-01-29 Thread Botao Sun
Linaro 14.01 Release (Calendar Week 5): Here is test result summary for Linux Linaro ubuntu Saucy image on following boards: 1) Samsung Arndale; 2) TI Panda 4430; 3) TI Panda 4460. 1. Samsung Arndale + Linux Linaro Saucy (Column AR): https://docs.google.com/a/linaro.org/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AgB-

Re: AArch64 toolchain status

2014-01-29 Thread Anil Singhar
Does anyone know how to increase the disk size on Foundation Model? For some reason, the network connectivity to the foundation model (via ssh localhost) doesn't work reliably. So my earlier attempts to mount my host computer's drive and get things done doesn't work reliably either. Now I am stuc

Re: 32bit binaries on 64-bit linux

2014-01-29 Thread Victor Kamensky
On 29 January 2014 08:36, Wookey wrote: > Someone asked if this worked, and I thought 'that's trivial to test with > multiarch' so I did. > On Saucy (where there is no multiarch version skew issue between binary > versions of packages) the > dpkg --add-architecutre armhf > apt-get update > apt-ge

Re: 32bit binaries on 64-bit linux

2014-01-29 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Wednesday 29 January 2014 17:40:54 Wookey wrote: > +++ Arnd Bergmann [2014-01-29 18:14 +0100]: > > On Wednesday 29 January 2014 16:36:49 Wookey wrote: > > > Running 32-bit binaries is quite seriously broken until this is fixed. I > > > presume this currently isn't on anyone's list to fix? I'm no

Re: 32bit binaries on 64-bit linux

2014-01-29 Thread Wookey
+++ Arnd Bergmann [2014-01-29 18:14 +0100]: > On Wednesday 29 January 2014 16:36:49 Wookey wrote: > > Running 32-bit binaries is quite seriously broken until this is fixed. I > > presume this currently isn't on anyone's list to fix? I'm not sure who's > > list it should go on. > > Are you running

Re: 32bit binaries on 64-bit linux

2014-01-29 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Wednesday 29 January 2014 16:36:49 Wookey wrote: > Running 32-bit binaries is quite seriously broken until this is fixed. I > presume this currently isn't on anyone's list to fix? I'm not sure who's > list it should go on. Are you running with 4KB or 64KB page size in the kernel? IIRC you canno

32bit binaries on 64-bit linux

2014-01-29 Thread Wookey
Someone asked if this worked, and I thought 'that's trivial to test with multiarch' so I did. On Saucy (where there is no multiarch version skew issue between binary versions of packages) the dpkg --add-architecutre armhf apt-get update apt-get install links:armhf part works very nicely. Everythin