On 30 January 2014 04:50, Anil Singhar wrote:
> Does anyone know how to increase the disk size on Foundation Model?
>
> For some reason, the network connectivity to the foundation model (via ssh
> localhost) doesn't work reliably. So my earlier attempts to mount my host
> computer's drive and get
Linaro 14.01 Release (Calendar Week 5): Here is test result summary for
Linux Linaro ubuntu Saucy image on following boards:
1) Samsung Arndale;
2) TI Panda 4430;
3) TI Panda 4460.
1. Samsung Arndale + Linux Linaro Saucy (Column AR):
https://docs.google.com/a/linaro.org/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AgB-
Does anyone know how to increase the disk size on Foundation Model?
For some reason, the network connectivity to the foundation model (via ssh
localhost) doesn't work reliably. So my earlier attempts to mount my host
computer's drive and get things done doesn't work reliably either. Now I
am stuc
On 29 January 2014 08:36, Wookey wrote:
> Someone asked if this worked, and I thought 'that's trivial to test with
> multiarch' so I did.
> On Saucy (where there is no multiarch version skew issue between binary
> versions of packages) the
> dpkg --add-architecutre armhf
> apt-get update
> apt-ge
On Wednesday 29 January 2014 17:40:54 Wookey wrote:
> +++ Arnd Bergmann [2014-01-29 18:14 +0100]:
> > On Wednesday 29 January 2014 16:36:49 Wookey wrote:
> > > Running 32-bit binaries is quite seriously broken until this is fixed. I
> > > presume this currently isn't on anyone's list to fix? I'm no
+++ Arnd Bergmann [2014-01-29 18:14 +0100]:
> On Wednesday 29 January 2014 16:36:49 Wookey wrote:
> > Running 32-bit binaries is quite seriously broken until this is fixed. I
> > presume this currently isn't on anyone's list to fix? I'm not sure who's
> > list it should go on.
>
> Are you running
On Wednesday 29 January 2014 16:36:49 Wookey wrote:
> Running 32-bit binaries is quite seriously broken until this is fixed. I
> presume this currently isn't on anyone's list to fix? I'm not sure who's
> list it should go on.
Are you running with 4KB or 64KB page size in the kernel? IIRC you
canno
Someone asked if this worked, and I thought 'that's trivial to test with
multiarch' so I did.
On Saucy (where there is no multiarch version skew issue between binary
versions of packages) the
dpkg --add-architecutre armhf
apt-get update
apt-get install links:armhf
part works very nicely. Everythin