)
continue;
per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, j) = NULL;
}
}
We are assigning NULL without freeing that memory.
Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 8 +++-
1 file changed
On 01/04/2013 10:49 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 3 January 2013 19:55, Srivatsa S. Bhat
srivatsa.b...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
I took a quick look at the problem you described above, and the cpufreq
code..
If we cannot avoid calling cpufreq_add_dev() from cpufreq_remove_dev(), then
I can't
On 06/28/2012 01:04 PM, Thomas Renninger wrote:
On Wednesday, June 27, 2012 06:16:33 PM Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
On 06/27/2012 02:37 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
When the system is booted with some cpus offline, the idle
driver is not initialized. When a cpu is set online, the
acpi code call
.
This patch is intended to remove this dependency by using the
notifier of intel_idle. This patch has the benefit of
encapsulating the intel_idle driver and remove some exported
functions.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@linaro.org
Looks good to me.
Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat
On 06/28/2012 04:57 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 06/28/2012 01:24 PM, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
On 06/28/2012 02:16 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
When the system is booted with some cpus offline, the idle
driver is not initialized. When a cpu is set online, the
acpi code call the intel idle init
on the existing timer related one (because
you are handling a dependency here, which might not apply to timers, or even
worse, cause unwanted side-effects, if any).
I'll take a look at the rest of the patch tomorrow. I think Thomas has already
pointed out the rest of the issues.
Regards,
Srivatsa S
...
+ cpuidle_unregister_device(dev);
+ }
+
+ cpuidle_unregister_driver(drv);
+
+ goto out;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_register);
+
Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http
'cpuidle_register_driver' and 'cpuidle_register_device' as low
level initialization routines to do some specific operations on the
cpuidle devices.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@linaro.org
Looks good to me now.
Acked-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat srivatsa.b...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat
On 03/30/2012 09:48 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 03/30/2012 01:59 PM, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
On 03/30/2012 05:15 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 03/30/2012 01:25 PM, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
On 03/30/2012 04:18 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
The usual cpuidle initialization routines
(struct cpuidle_driver *drv)
{return -ENODEV; }
static inline struct cpuidle_driver *cpuidle_get_driver(void) {return NULL; }
Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo
On 03/19/2012 11:47 AM, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
This patch adds support for generic cpu thermal cooling low level
implementations using cpuhotplug based on the thermal level requested
from user. Different cpu related cooling devices can be registered by the
user and the binding of these
11 matches
Mail list logo
