there wasn't any problem either.
I tried running several times but it gets stuck at the same point and there
is no reponse
to key presses.
Thanks for any help!
Regards,
Sundar
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Loïc Minier wrote:
> Hey
>
> (Cc:ing linaro-dev@ where we u
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Amit Kachhap wrote:
> Yes that should be helpful. Even the things your are suggesting are
> somewhat same with some patches submitted which sets cpufreq min/max
> constraint.
Hmm..let me see how soon can I code up a rough implementation!
Cheers!
--
-
Th
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> Sundar,
Hi Amit,
> At the moment it doesn't. But there was some discussion around
> creating something that will work with devfreq. This would allow
> peripheral drivers to be plugged in as well. Amit is investigating
Hi Amit,
Thanks for the replies. One more query
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Amit Kachhap wrote:
>> "Different cpu related cooling devices": Do you mean cooling devices
>> for different CPUs (num_cpus) or are you referring to different
>> customers aka consumer drivers who could use this f
Hi Amit,
I am new here; so please bear with my questions/doubts :)
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Amit Daniel Kachhap
wrote:
> This patch adds support for generic cpu thermal cooling low level
> implementations using frequency scaling up/down based on the request
> from user. Different cpu rel
Hi Vincent,
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Vincent Guittot
> wrote:
>>
>> This patch extracts the common code of the cpu hotplug feature across
>> arm platforms. The goal is to only keep the specific stuff of the
>> platform in the sub-architecture. I have created a hotplug.c file in
>> the
Hello Vincent,
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> This patch extracts the common code of the cpu hotplug feature across
> arm platforms. The goal is to only keep the specific stuff of the
> platform in the sub-architecture. I have created a hotplug.c file in
> the arm/com
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Yong Shen wrote:
> BTW, 'cheers' is normally used in Australia and New Zealand. Are you from
> there? Just curious. :)
Oh really??..I am not aware of that all.I am from India :). IMO its cool.
cheers!
___
linaro-dev ma
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 5:25 AM, Kevin Hilman
wrote:
>
[..]
>
> That being said, I'm not against $SUBJECT patch, but I question it's
> usefulness in terms of PM. What's more valuable for PM is the statitics
> and knobs exported on a per-device level by the runtime PM core (and
> AFAICT, already i
may run at half the voltage/clocking for reduced
loads; storage devices running at reduced loads when the overall QoS
parameters may signify a power-save mode vs performance mode etc.
Please do let me know of your views on the above.
Regards,
Sundar
___
e some details available for this; any generic overview of how
this is going to progress?
Cheers!
Sundar
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
11 matches
Mail list logo
