On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 09:11:32AM -0500, Rob Lee wrote:
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 3:10 AM, Sascha Hauer s.ha...@pengutronix.de wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 06:37:48PM -0500, Robert Lee wrote:
The imx5_idle() check of the tzic_eanble_wake() return value uses
incorrect (inverted) logic
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 06:37:48PM -0500, Robert Lee wrote:
The imx5_idle() check of the tzic_eanble_wake() return value uses
incorrect (inverted) logic causing all attempt to idle to fail.
Does this have influence on current kernels or does this only trigger
with your cpuidle patches?
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 3:10 AM, Sascha Hauer s.ha...@pengutronix.de wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 06:37:48PM -0500, Robert Lee wrote:
The imx5_idle() check of the tzic_eanble_wake() return value uses
incorrect (inverted) logic causing all attempt to idle to fail.
Does this have influence
The imx5_idle() check of the tzic_eanble_wake() return value uses
incorrect (inverted) logic causing all attempt to idle to fail.
Signed-off-by: Robert Lee rob@linaro.org
---
arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx5.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
