On 18 March 2011 08:43, Patrik Ryd wrote:
> On 18 March 2011 07:06, Jim Huang wrote:
>
>> On 17 March 2011 23:35, Patrik Ryd wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > I think your patches are good enough (now after the review) to start
>> pushing
>> > them to a toolchain_preview branch. That way people can use
>> >
On 18 March 2011 07:06, Jim Huang wrote:
> On 17 March 2011 23:35, Patrik Ryd wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I think your patches are good enough (now after the review) to start
> pushing
> > them to a toolchain_preview branch. That way people can use
> > the toolchain_preview branch when working with the t
On 17 March 2011 23:35, Patrik Ryd wrote:
> Hi,
> I think your patches are good enough (now after the review) to start pushing
> them to a toolchain_preview branch. That way people can use
> the toolchain_preview branch when working with the toolchain.
> At the same time someone can try to replace
Hi,
I think your patches are good enough (now after the review) to start pushing
them to a toolchain_preview branch. That way people can use
the toolchain_preview branch when working with the toolchain.
At the same time someone can try to replace some of your patches with
solutions that solves th
Hi,
The next set of patches will help in building Android source code out of the
box using Linaro GCC 4.5/4.6 toolchains.
The patches basically try to circumvent the build problem caused by stricter
GCC 4.5/4.6.
These patches are based on remotes/m/linaro_android_2.3.2 branch.
Regards,
Sachin
