Daniel Lezcano wrote:
These couple of patches use the new cpuidle core api to refactor
some part of the code. The first one declares the states directly
in the driver declaration and the second one use the timekeeping
flag to let the cpuidle core to compute the idle time.
Basically, looks
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 10:52:46AM +0200, Heiko St??bner wrote:
Am Montag, 14. Mai 2012, 01:51:00 schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
On 05/09/2012 04:08 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
Are these patches ok for inclusion ?
you might want to include the maintainer
Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com
On 05/14/2012 10:57 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 10:52:46AM +0200, Heiko St??bner wrote:
Am Montag, 14. Mai 2012, 01:51:00 schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
On 05/09/2012 04:08 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
Are these patches ok for inclusion ?
you might want to include the maintainer
On 05/14/2012 03:51 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
On 05/14/12 18:22, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 05/14/2012 10:57 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 10:52:46AM +0200, Heiko St??bner wrote:
Am Montag, 14. Mai 2012, 01:51:00 schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
On 05/09/2012 04:08 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 05/09/2012 04:08 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
These couple of patches use the new cpuidle core api to refactor
some part of the code. The first one declares the states directly
in the driver declaration and the second one use the timekeeping
flag to let the cpuidle core to compute the idle time.
These couple of patches use the new cpuidle core api to refactor
some part of the code. The first one declares the states directly
in the driver declaration and the second one use the timekeeping
flag to let the cpuidle core to compute the idle time.
I don't have this board, I was not able to
