On Tuesday, September 18, 2012, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:35:00PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > On 09/17/2012 10:50 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Monday, September 17, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > >> On 09/08/2012 12:17 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > >>>
On Monday, September 17, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 09/17/2012 10:50 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, September 17, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >> On 09/08/2012 12:17 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>> On Friday, September 07, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> Since commit 46bcf
>
> It is similar with Tegra3.
>
In our case CPU0 has different latencies for 1 C state compared to the other
CPUs
> I think Peter and Lorenzo already wrote a driver based on this approach.
> Peter, Lorenzo any comments ?
>
Yes. My implementation doesn't provide a state table in the cpuidle d
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:35:00PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 09/17/2012 10:50 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, September 17, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >> On 09/08/2012 12:17 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>> On Friday, September 07, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
[...]
> >>>
On 09/17/2012 10:50 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, September 17, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 09/08/2012 12:17 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Friday, September 07, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
Since commit 46bcfad7a819bd17ac4e831b04405152d59784ab,
cpuidle: Sing
On Monday, September 17, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 09/08/2012 12:17 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday, September 07, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >> Since commit 46bcfad7a819bd17ac4e831b04405152d59784ab,
> >> cpuidle: Single/Global registration of idle states
> >>
> >> we h
On 09/08/2012 12:17 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, September 07, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> Since commit 46bcfad7a819bd17ac4e831b04405152d59784ab,
>> cpuidle: Single/Global registration of idle states
>>
>> we have a single registration for the cpuidle states which makes
>> s
On Friday, September 07, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> Since commit 46bcfad7a819bd17ac4e831b04405152d59784ab,
> cpuidle: Single/Global registration of idle states
>
> we have a single registration for the cpuidle states which makes
> sense. But now two new architectures are coming: tegra3
On 09/07/2012 01:04 PM, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Daniel Lezcano
> wrote:
>> Since commit 46bcfad7a819bd17ac4e831b04405152d59784ab,
>> cpuidle: Single/Global registration of idle states
>>
>> we have a single registration for the cpuidle states which makes
>> s
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Daniel Lezcano
wrote:
> Since commit 46bcfad7a819bd17ac4e831b04405152d59784ab,
> cpuidle: Single/Global registration of idle states
>
> we have a single registration for the cpuidle states which makes
> sense. But now two new architectures are coming: tegra3
Since commit 46bcfad7a819bd17ac4e831b04405152d59784ab,
cpuidle: Single/Global registration of idle states
we have a single registration for the cpuidle states which makes
sense. But now two new architectures are coming: tegra3 and big.LITTLE.
These architectures have different cpus with d
11 matches
Mail list logo