On Tuesday 05 July 2011, David Dajun Chen wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> Da903x driver was developed for da9034/5 pmic family devices, which are
> totally
> different from the da9052 family.
Ok, I've looked at some of the drivers now and I see what you mean.
While there is some similarity in the drivers,
> -Original Message-
> From: Arnd Bergmann [mailto:a...@arndb.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 5:57 PM
> To: Ashish Jangam
> Cc: Mark Brown; sa...@openedhand.com; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; Dajun;
> linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/11] MFD: D
; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
; David Dajun Chen; linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
主题： Re: [PATCH 1/11] MFD: DA9052 MFD core module v1
On Tuesday 05 July 2011, Ashish Jangam wrote:
> DA9053 chip submission was done by Linaro and now they have agreed that
> we will be only responsible for
On Tuesday 05 July 2011, Ashish Jangam wrote:
> DA9053 chip submission was done by Linaro and now they have agreed that
> we will be only responsible for DA9053 submission too so now we can
> skip the posted DA9053 patch.
Ok.
> Regarding file naming convention da9052 seems to be appropriate since
On Tuesday 28 June 2011, ashishj3 wrote:
> The DA9052 is a highly integrated PMIC subsystem with supply domain
> flexibility
> to support wide range of high performance application.
>
> It provides voltage regulators, GPIO controller, Touch Screen, RTC, Battery
> control and other functionality.
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 07:46:49PM +0530, ashishj3 wrote:
> +static int da9052_add_subdevs(struct da9052 *da9052)
> +{
> + struct da9052_pdata *pdata = da9052->dev->platform_data;
> + int ret;
> +
> + static struct mfd_cell __initdata da9052_subdev_info[] = {
> + {"da9052-o
