On Tuesday, January 29, 2013 08:00:23 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 29 January 2013 17:21, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, January 29, 2013 10:09:59 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >> With the addition of following patch, related_cpus is required to be set by
> >> cpufreq platform drivers:
> >>
>
On 29 January 2013 17:21, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 29, 2013 10:09:59 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> With the addition of following patch, related_cpus is required to be set by
>> cpufreq platform drivers:
>>
>> commit c1070fd743533efb54e98142252283583f379190
>> Author: Viresh Kuma
On Tuesday, January 29, 2013 10:09:59 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> With the addition of following patch, related_cpus is required to be set by
> cpufreq platform drivers:
>
> commit c1070fd743533efb54e98142252283583f379190
> Author: Viresh Kumar
> Date: Mon Jan 14 13:23:04 2013 +
>
> cpufr
On 29 January 2013 10:09, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> With the addition of following patch, related_cpus is required to be set by
> cpufreq platform drivers:
>
> commit c1070fd743533efb54e98142252283583f379190
> Author: Viresh Kumar
> Date: Mon Jan 14 13:23:04 2013 +
>
> cpufreq: Simplify cpu
With the addition of following patch, related_cpus is required to be set by
cpufreq platform drivers:
commit c1070fd743533efb54e98142252283583f379190
Author: Viresh Kumar
Date: Mon Jan 14 13:23:04 2013 +
cpufreq: Simplify cpufreq_add_dev()
Because this change is required by all platfo