Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: Set policy->related_cpus to atleast policy->cpus

2013-01-29 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, January 29, 2013 08:00:23 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 29 January 2013 17:21, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Tuesday, January 29, 2013 10:09:59 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: > >> With the addition of following patch, related_cpus is required to be set by > >> cpufreq platform drivers: > >> >

Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: Set policy->related_cpus to atleast policy->cpus

2013-01-29 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 29 January 2013 17:21, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, January 29, 2013 10:09:59 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: >> With the addition of following patch, related_cpus is required to be set by >> cpufreq platform drivers: >> >> commit c1070fd743533efb54e98142252283583f379190 >> Author: Viresh Kuma

Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: Set policy->related_cpus to atleast policy->cpus

2013-01-29 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, January 29, 2013 10:09:59 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: > With the addition of following patch, related_cpus is required to be set by > cpufreq platform drivers: > > commit c1070fd743533efb54e98142252283583f379190 > Author: Viresh Kumar > Date: Mon Jan 14 13:23:04 2013 + > > cpufr

Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: Set policy->related_cpus to atleast policy->cpus

2013-01-28 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 29 January 2013 10:09, Viresh Kumar wrote: > With the addition of following patch, related_cpus is required to be set by > cpufreq platform drivers: > > commit c1070fd743533efb54e98142252283583f379190 > Author: Viresh Kumar > Date: Mon Jan 14 13:23:04 2013 + > > cpufreq: Simplify cpu

[PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: Set policy->related_cpus to atleast policy->cpus

2013-01-28 Thread Viresh Kumar
With the addition of following patch, related_cpus is required to be set by cpufreq platform drivers: commit c1070fd743533efb54e98142252283583f379190 Author: Viresh Kumar Date: Mon Jan 14 13:23:04 2013 + cpufreq: Simplify cpufreq_add_dev() Because this change is required by all platfo