On 22 February 2013 08:03, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, February 22, 2013 07:47:44 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> On 22 February 2013 05:15, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> > Why did you change all of the lines of this macro instead of changing just
>> > the
>> > one line you needed to change?
>
On Friday, February 22, 2013 07:47:44 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 22 February 2013 05:15, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Why did you change all of the lines of this macro instead of changing just
> > the
> > one line you needed to change?
>
> I didn't like the indentation used within the macro. So
On 22 February 2013 05:15, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Why did you change all of the lines of this macro instead of changing just the
> one line you needed to change?
I didn't like the indentation used within the macro. So did it.
> Please don't do that.
Okay.
__
On Monday, February 11, 2013 01:20:03 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> We don't need to keep two structures for file attributes, global_attr and
> freq_attr. Lets use freq_attr only for cpufreq core and drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 9 -
> dri
We don't need to keep two structures for file attributes, global_attr and
freq_attr. Lets use freq_attr only for cpufreq core and drivers.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar
---
drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 9 -
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 30 +++---
include/li
