On Wednesday, January 30, 2013 05:57:39 PM Fabio Baltieri wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:21:03PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > I'm not sure about the name through, I like mentioning sw coordination in
> > > it
> > > because that's the comment in the declaration:
> > >
> > > cpumask
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:21:03PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > I'm not sure about the name through, I like mentioning sw coordination in it
> > because that's the comment in the declaration:
> >
> > cpumask_var_t cpus; /* CPUs requiring sw coordination */
> > cpumask_
On 30 January 2013 21:53, Fabio Baltieri wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 08:32:38PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> I believe this routine should be rather present in cpufreq core code,
>> as their might
>> be other users of it. Its really not related to dbs or governors.
>>
>> My ideas about the
Hi Viresh,
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 08:32:38PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Hi Fabio,
>
> I know Rafael has asked you to send only the incremental patch, but i
> am interested in reviewing whole series again, as i haven't reviewed
> earlier stuff :)
Sure, take your chance.
[internal note]
> I be
Hi Fabio,
I know Rafael has asked you to send only the incremental patch, but i
am interested in reviewing whole series again, as i haven't reviewed
earlier stuff :)
I believe you are required to send patches to patc...@linaro.org too :)
On 30 January 2013 18:30, Fabio Baltieri wrote:
> From: R
From: Rickard Andersson
This patch fixes a bug that occurred when we had load on a secondary CPU
and the primary CPU was sleeping. Only one sampling timer was spawned
and it was spawned as a deferred timer on the primary CPU, so when a
secondary CPU had a change in load this was not detected by t
