On 28 August 2011 13:11, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 12:50:54PM +0200, Per Forlin wrote:
>> On 26 August 2011 18:28, Santosh wrote:
>> > + Balaji,
>> >
>> > On Friday 26 August 2011 09:49 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I'm not sure who's responsible
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 12:50:54PM +0200, Per Forlin wrote:
> On 26 August 2011 18:28, Santosh wrote:
> > + Balaji,
> >
> > On Friday 26 August 2011 09:49 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm not sure who's responsible for this, but the nonblocking MMC stuff is
> >> broken on OMAPs HS
On 26 August 2011 18:28, Santosh wrote:
> + Balaji,
>
> On Friday 26 August 2011 09:49 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>
>> I'm not sure who's responsible for this, but the nonblocking MMC stuff is
>> broken on OMAPs HSMMC:
>>
>> mmcblk0: error -84 transferring data, sector 149201, nr 64, cmd
+ Balaji,
On Friday 26 August 2011 09:49 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
I'm not sure who's responsible for this, but the nonblocking MMC stuff is
broken on OMAPs HSMMC:
mmcblk0: error -84 transferring data, sector 149201, nr 64, cmd response 0x900,
card status 0xb00
mmcblk0: retrying usin
I'm not sure who's responsible for this, but the nonblocking MMC stuff is
broken on OMAPs HSMMC:
mmcblk0: error -84 transferring data, sector 149201, nr 64, cmd response 0x900,
card status 0xb00
mmcblk0: retrying using single block re
Hi Per,
On Fri, Jul 01 2011, Per Forlin wrote:
> How significant is the cache maintenance over head?
> It depends, the eMMC are much faster now
> compared to a few years ago and cache maintenance cost more due to
> multiple cache levels and speculative cache pre-fetch. In relation the
> cost for h
How significant is the cache maintenance over head?
It depends, the eMMC are much faster now
compared to a few years ago and cache maintenance cost more due to
multiple cache levels and speculative cache pre-fetch. In relation the
cost for handling the caches have increased and is now a bottle neck
