On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Ricardo Salveti
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Amit Kucheria
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Ricardo Salveti
So in the end we'd be generating 2 sets of hwpacks per board, one
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Ricardo Salveti
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Amit Kucheria
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Ricardo Salveti
>>> So in the end we'd be generating 2 sets of hwpacks per board, one
>>> based on the Development Overlay (latest components, even i
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Ricardo Salveti
>> So in the end we'd be generating 2 sets of hwpacks per board, one
>> based on the Development Overlay (latest components, even if not
>> working properly), and one based on the Stable PPAs, th
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Ricardo Salveti
wrote:
> Looking at the problem, here's what I think it'd help to fix the situation:
> 1 - Overlay PPA becomes the main repository for basic platform
> development, without having any hardware specific package (not even
> the kernel):
> This PPA w
Hi,
Following some complains and issues with the way we're currently
maintaining our main Overlay PPA, I'd like to propose a new way to
produce the Ubuntu LEBs, by generating Stable and Unstable/Development
focused images.
At the moment all the development work for the Ubuntu LEB happens at 2
dif
