Hi Rob,
I got your point. The main idea of doing like this is to keep the
cooling implementation independent from thermal zone
algorithms(thermal_sys.c). But binding freq_tab index to the trip
numbers may be not be bad idea. I will give more thought into it in
the next patchset.
Regards,
Amit D
Hey Amit/Vincent,
It appears that with this implementation the STATE_ACTIVE trip number
used will also be the index of the cool_freq_tab used. If that is
true, then perhaps a common structure would be beneficial that links
each STATE_ACTIVE trip point with its corresponding cooling data.
BR,
Rob
Hi Vincent,
Thanks for the review.
Well actually your are correct that current temperature and last
temperature can be used to increase or decrease the cpu frequency. But
this has to be done again in cooling devices so to make the cooling
devices generic and to avoid the temperature comparison ag
Hi Vincent,
Thanks for the review.
Well actually your are correct that current temperature and last
temperature can be used to increase or decrease the cufreq. But this has to
be done again in cooling devices so to make the cooling devices generic and
to avoid the temperature comparision again thi
Hi Amit,
I'm not sure that using the trip index for setting the state of a
cooling device is a generic solution because you are adding a
dependency between the trip index and the cooling device state that
might be difficult to handle. This dependency implies that a cooling
device like cpufreq_cool
