Re: 32bit binaries on 64-bit linux (fixed)

2014-02-24 Thread Wookey
+++ Wookey [2014-01-29 16:36 +]: > Someone asked if this worked, and I thought 'that's trivial to test with > multiarch' so I did. > On Saucy (where there is no multiarch version skew issue between binary > versions of packages) the > dpkg --add-architecutre armhf > apt-get update > apt-get in

Re: 32bit binaries on 64-bit linux

2014-02-10 Thread Rob Herring
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 29 January 2014 17:40:54 Wookey wrote: >> +++ Arnd Bergmann [2014-01-29 18:14 +0100]: >> > On Wednesday 29 January 2014 16:36:49 Wookey wrote: >> > > Running 32-bit binaries is quite seriously broken until this is fixed. I >> >

Re: 32bit binaries on 64-bit linux

2014-01-29 Thread Victor Kamensky
On 29 January 2014 08:36, Wookey wrote: > Someone asked if this worked, and I thought 'that's trivial to test with > multiarch' so I did. > On Saucy (where there is no multiarch version skew issue between binary > versions of packages) the > dpkg --add-architecutre armhf > apt-get update > apt-ge

Re: 32bit binaries on 64-bit linux

2014-01-29 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Wednesday 29 January 2014 17:40:54 Wookey wrote: > +++ Arnd Bergmann [2014-01-29 18:14 +0100]: > > On Wednesday 29 January 2014 16:36:49 Wookey wrote: > > > Running 32-bit binaries is quite seriously broken until this is fixed. I > > > presume this currently isn't on anyone's list to fix? I'm no

Re: 32bit binaries on 64-bit linux

2014-01-29 Thread Wookey
+++ Arnd Bergmann [2014-01-29 18:14 +0100]: > On Wednesday 29 January 2014 16:36:49 Wookey wrote: > > Running 32-bit binaries is quite seriously broken until this is fixed. I > > presume this currently isn't on anyone's list to fix? I'm not sure who's > > list it should go on. > > Are you running

Re: 32bit binaries on 64-bit linux

2014-01-29 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Wednesday 29 January 2014 16:36:49 Wookey wrote: > Running 32-bit binaries is quite seriously broken until this is fixed. I > presume this currently isn't on anyone's list to fix? I'm not sure who's > list it should go on. Are you running with 4KB or 64KB page size in the kernel? IIRC you canno

32bit binaries on 64-bit linux

2014-01-29 Thread Wookey
Someone asked if this worked, and I thought 'that's trivial to test with multiarch' so I did. On Saucy (where there is no multiarch version skew issue between binary versions of packages) the dpkg --add-architecutre armhf apt-get update apt-get install links:armhf part works very nicely. Everythin