Re: Break in gcc-linaro tarball naming conventions, was: Re: Bug 809768 integration into gcc 4.6 for Linaro Android 1107 release

2011-07-22 Thread Michael Hope
(On holiday so short) The tarball name has changed to match the new Linaro conventions. I forgot to put that in the announcement. The inner directory name should change as well but was missed, sorry. On Jul 21, 2011 6:59 PM, Paul Sokolovsky paul.sokolov...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Well, before

Break in gcc-linaro tarball naming conventions, was: Re: Bug 809768 integration into gcc 4.6 for Linaro Android 1107 release

2011-07-21 Thread Paul Sokolovsky
Hello, Well, before proceeding further, there seems that tarball naming convention has changed. For example, now it's gcc-linaro-4.6-2011.07.tar.bz2 whereas before it was gcc-linaro-4.6-2011.06-0.tar.bz2 . What's worse is that inside it's still gcc-linaro-4.6-2011.07-0 top-level directory. The

Break in gcc-linaro tarball naming conventions, was: Re: Bug 809768 integration into gcc 4.6 for Linaro Android 1107 release

2011-07-21 Thread Paul Sokolovsky
Hello, Well, before proceeding further, there seems that tarball naming convention has changed. For example, now it's gcc-linaro-4.6-2011.07.tar.bz2 whereas before it was gcc-linaro-4.6-2011.06-0.tar.bz2 . What's worse is that inside it's still gcc-linaro-4.6-2011.07-0 top-level directory. The