On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 1:08 PM, James Tunnicliffe
james.tunnicli...@linaro.org wrote:
I just tested two a nano images using ext4 and they didn't find the
root file system. So, we are at least gated on that bug.
I filed https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-ubuntu/+bug/822593 to make
ext4 our
On 4 August 2011 15:37, David Gilbert david.gilb...@linaro.org wrote:
On 4 August 2011 15:28, James Tunnicliffe james.tunnicli...@linaro.org
wrote:
On 4 August 2011 14:56, David Gilbert david.gilb...@linaro.org wrote:
On 4 August 2011 14:52, James Tunnicliffe james.tunnicli...@linaro.org
Hi,
Our current default root file system, ext3, is proving to be a
bottleneck for SD card performance. Not only does it take a long time
to format the partitions, but it also takes a long time to write to.
This slows down creating images on SD cards a lot. I just did a very
simple experiment
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/04/2011 01:46 PM, James Tunnicliffe wrote:
Hi,
Our current default root file system, ext3, is proving to be a
bottleneck for SD card performance. Not only does it take a long time
to format the partitions, but it also takes a long time to
On Thu, 4 Aug 2011 12:46:58 +0100
James Tunnicliffe james.tunnicli...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi,
Our current default root file system, ext3, is proving to be a
bottleneck for SD card performance. Not only does it take a long time
to format the partitions, but it also takes a long time to write
Hi James
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 6:46 AM, James Tunnicliffe
james.tunnicli...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi,
Our current default root file system, ext3, is proving to be a
bottleneck for SD card performance. Not only does it take a long time
to format the partitions, but it also takes a long time to
As I understand it, btrfs is considered OK for file systems running on
systems that don't suffer from power failure, so for writing an image
and testing it this should be fine.
So, what do people think about switching?
I too would be considered about filesystem integrity given the number
On 4 August 2011 13:07, Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@linaro.org wrote:
IMHO it is not stable enough and I am not sure it is worth having such
filesystem as it is mainly used for snapshotting. The last time I played
with it, the FS was quickly corrupted but I don't have to complain
because the
On 4 August 2011 14:52, James Tunnicliffe james.tunnicli...@linaro.org wrote:
I have seen poor performance when DDing to a card, which I assume is
because dd is not writing large aligned chunks. If we can dd the first
meg or so of data onto the card, then write in 4MB chunks that are all
4MB
On 4 August 2011 15:28, James Tunnicliffe james.tunnicli...@linaro.org wrote:
On 4 August 2011 14:56, David Gilbert david.gilb...@linaro.org wrote:
On 4 August 2011 14:52, James Tunnicliffe james.tunnicli...@linaro.org
wrote:
I have seen poor performance when DDing to a card, which I assume
10 matches
Mail list logo
