Hi Catalin,
> > Our plan is definitely to get this into the Linaro kernel for the
> > 11.05 release. My preferred approach is to get it into Catalin's
> > public tree by early Q1, so that we stand a chance of merging it into
> > the Linaro consolidated kernel.
>
> Another step before this would be
On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 18:21 +0100, Bobby Batacharia wrote:
> > Yes, the earlier the better to starting incorporating the
> > changes in Linux.
[...]
> Our plan is definitely to get this into the Linaro kernel for the
> 11.05 release. My preferred approach is to get it into Catalin's
> public tree b
s fixed secure code.)
-Bobby
> -Original Message-
> From: Shilimkar, Santosh [mailto:santosh.shilim...@ti.com]
> Sent: 18 October 2010 08:09
> To: Bobby Batacharia; Jon Callan; linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: RE: Common ARM context save/restore code
>
> > ---
ent: Sunday, October 17, 2010 4:08 AM
>> To: Shilimkar, Santosh; Jon Callan; linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
>> Subject: RE: Common ARM context save/restore code
>>
>> Santosh,
>>
>> Again - apologies for the tardy responses to this thread.
>>
>>&g
> -Original Message-
> From: Bobby Batacharia [mailto:bobby.batacha...@arm.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 12:33 PM
> To: Shilimkar, Santosh; Jon Callan; linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: RE: Common ARM context save/restore code
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks f
g that.It's doable but it will end up with some SOC specific execeptions.
Understood.
-Bobby
> -Original Message-
> From: Shilimkar, Santosh [mailto:santosh.shilim...@ti.com]
> Sent: 18 October 2010 06:19
> To: Bobby Batacharia; Jon Callan; linaro-dev@lists.linaro.o
Bobby,
> -Original Message-
> From: Bobby Batacharia [mailto:bobby.batacha...@arm.com]
> Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2010 4:08 AM
> To: Shilimkar, Santosh; Jon Callan; linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: RE: Common ARM context save/restore code
>
> Santosh,
>
>
gt; Sent: 12 October 2010 12:03
> To: Jon Callan; linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: RE: Common ARM context save/restore code
>
> Jon
> > -Original Message-
> > From: linaro-dev-boun...@lists.linaro.org [mailto:linaro-dev-
> > boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of
this work in time..
-Bobby
> -Original Message-
> From: linaro-dev-boun...@lists.linaro.org
> [mailto:linaro-dev-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of
> Amit Kucheria
> Sent: 13 October 2010 09:42
> To: Jon Callan
> Cc: linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: Re:
linaro.org]
> Sent: 12 October 2010 13:32
> To: Jon Callan
> Cc: linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: Re: Common ARM context save/restore code
>
> :)
>
> As you can see, if you make the source available somewhere, there is plenty
> of people interested in dissecting it.
>
&
amit.kuche...@linaro.org]
Sent: 12 October 2010 13:32
To: Jon Callan
Cc: linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: Common ARM context save/restore code
:)
As you can see, if you make the source available somewhere, there is plenty
of people interested in dissecting it.
Jon, if you start working on them i
ation from 1st December. I have done some
> Linux kernel work before but I'm a little rusty.
>
> Jon.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Amit Kucheria [mailto:amit.kuche...@linaro.org]
> Sent: 12 October 2010 12:04
> To: Jon Callan
> Cc: linaro-dev@lists.linaro.
rusty.
Jon.
-Original Message-
From: Amit Kucheria [mailto:amit.kuche...@linaro.org]
Sent: 12 October 2010 12:04
To: Jon Callan
Cc: linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: Common ARM context save/restore code
Jon,
I'm sure you anticipated this - What is your plan for pushing this
October 2010 11:48
To: Jon Callan
Cc: linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: Common ARM context save/restore code
Hi Jon,
That is a nice follow up to the OMAP idle code clean up, cf.
http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-dev/2010-October/001084.html.
It would be nice to see how the code is
Jon,
I'm sure you anticipated this - What is your plan for pushing this out
to the kernel? :)
And how can we help?
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Jon Callan wrote:
> Vishwa,
>
> I have a more-or-less complete set of example code for CPU context
> save/restore, currently supporting A5/A8/A9 a
Jon
> -Original Message-
> From: linaro-dev-boun...@lists.linaro.org [mailto:linaro-dev-
> boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of Jon Callan
> Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 4:10 PM
> To: linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: Common ARM context save/restore code
>
Hi Jon,
That is a nice follow up to the OMAP idle code clean up, cf.
http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-dev/2010-October/001084.html.
It would be nice to see how the code is organized and the impact of
integrating it into the kernel.
Regards,
Jean
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Jon Call
Vishwa,
I have a more-or-less complete set of example code for CPU context
save/restore, currently supporting A5/A8/A9 and with planned support for Eagle.
It is structured as "firmware" at the moment, but it would be much better if it
was integrated into the ARM Linux kernel. The idea is the ke
>
>On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 12:55 AM, Nicolas Pitre
wrote:
>On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Vishwanath Sripathy wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Purpose of this email is to debate on the pros and cons of having a
common
>> ARM context save/restore code.
>> Currently each S
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Vishwanath Sripathy wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Purpose of this email is to debate on the pros and cons of having a common
> ARM context save/restore code.
> Currently each SOC has its own way of saving/restoring ARM registers and
> there has been a proposal to
Hi All,
Purpose of this email is to debate on the pros and cons of having a common
ARM context save/restore code.
Currently each SOC has its own way of saving/restoring ARM registers and
there has been a proposal to have a common code for the same instead of
duplicating the same in different
21 matches
Mail list logo
