On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 04:33:19PM +0100, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 16:11 +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> > Hi Tixy,
> >
> > Thanks for the patch. I think this patch is the right way to solve this
> > issue.
> >
> > There is still a problem with the priority filter in
>
On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 21:03 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 12 October 2012 20:41, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> > Thanks for the patch. I think this patch is the right way to solve this
> > issue.
> >
> > There is still a problem with the priority filter in
> > hmp_down_migration() which Viresh point
On 12 October 2012 20:41, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> Thanks for the patch. I think this patch is the right way to solve this
> issue.
>
> There is still a problem with the priority filter in
> hmp_down_migration() which Viresh pointed out earlier. There is no
> checking of whether the task is actua
On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 16:11 +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> Hi Tixy,
>
> Thanks for the patch. I think this patch is the right way to solve this
> issue.
>
> There is still a problem with the priority filter in
> hmp_down_migration() which Viresh pointed out earlier. There is no
> checking of wh
Hi Tixy,
Thanks for the patch. I think this patch is the right way to solve this
issue.
There is still a problem with the priority filter in
hmp_down_migration() which Viresh pointed out earlier. There is no
checking of whether the task is actually allowed to run on any of the
slower cpus. Solvin
On 12 October 2012 19:30, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> It will need fixing one way or the other, and it makes more sense to be
> part of the MP branch. I was hoping for a second opinion from someone,
> but if the fix looks OK to you, then yes, please add it to your branch.
Ok I have applied this
On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 19:11 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 12 October 2012 19:03, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 14:19 +0100, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> >> The attached patch fixes the immediate problem by avoiding the empty
> >> domain (which is probably a good thing anyw
On 10/12/2012 05:41 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 12 October 2012 19:03, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 14:19 +0100, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
The attached patch fixes the immediate problem by avoiding the empty
domain (which is probably a good thing anyway)
Oops, my last pat
On 12 October 2012 19:03, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 14:19 +0100, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
>> The attached patch fixes the immediate problem by avoiding the empty
>> domain (which is probably a good thing anyway)
>
> Oops, my last patch included some extra junk, the one a
On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 14:19 +0100, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> The attached patch fixes the immediate problem by avoiding the empty
> domain (which is probably a good thing anyway)
Oops, my last patch included some extra junk, the one attached to this
mail fixes this...
>From 7365076675b851355d48
On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 10:35 +0100, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 14:46 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > Hi Andrey,
> >
> > Please PULL b.L MP V10 branch from my tree.
>
> I've been testing with the v10 branch and with "Enable HMP priority
> filter by default" I have get a crash
11 matches
Mail list logo
