On 5 August 2011 14:40, Rob Herring wrote:
> Deepak, Nicolas,
>
> On 07/27/2011 09:58 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>>
>> To everyone, and especially to those who are expected to work on this
>> topic next week, please find below a list of tasks that needs to be
>> investigated and/or accomplished. I'
Deepak, Nicolas,
On 07/27/2011 09:58 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>
> To everyone, and especially to those who are expected to work on this
> topic next week, please find below a list of tasks that needs to be
> investigated and/or accomplished. I'll coordinate the work and collect
> patches for
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 07/29/2011 07:40 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > On Fri, 29 Jul 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 02:44:17PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
> >>
> I have a slightly biased interest in
On 07/29/2011 07:40 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jul 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 02:44:17PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>>> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
>>
I have a slightly biased interest in this, since ARM seems to like
funky memory maps f
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 02:44:17PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Jul 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
>
> > > I have a slightly biased interest in this, since ARM seems to like
> > > funky memory maps for many of its newer boards, and it would be
> >
On Friday 29 July 2011 10:09:46 Dave Martin wrote:
>
> That sounds sensible to me; I was just throwing ideas about, really.
Yes, and it was good that you brought it up. It's not obvious at
all why we shouldn't put code into the device tree and I'm sure
people will have the same idea in the future
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 02:44:17PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
[...]
> > Currently, device tree is not fully supported upstream for vexpress.
> > Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote some patches, but there were a few outstanding
> > issues and these weren't merged ye
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 09:42:15PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 28 July 2011 14:44:17 Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > >
> > > We could even embed the printch() function body into the DT if we
> > > wanted to make the kernel's job even simpler. Realistic implementations
> > > of this functio
On Thursday 28 July 2011 14:44:17 Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> >
> > We could even embed the printch() function body into the DT if we
> > wanted to make the kernel's job even simpler. Realistic implementations
> > of this function are tiny, so this shouldn't be too cumbersome.
> > That really seems an
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:58:36PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> >
> > To everyone, and especially to those who are expected to work on this
> > topic next week, please find below a list of tasks that needs to be
> > investigated and/or accomplished. I
On 07/27/2011 09:58 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>
> To everyone, and especially to those who are expected to work on this
> topic next week, please find below a list of tasks that needs to be
> investigated and/or accomplished. I'll coordinate the work and collect
> patches for the team.
>
> If
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:58:36PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>
> To everyone, and especially to those who are expected to work on this
> topic next week, please find below a list of tasks that needs to be
> investigated and/or accomplished. I'll coordinate the work and collect
> patches for
To everyone, and especially to those who are expected to work on this
topic next week, please find below a list of tasks that needs to be
investigated and/or accomplished. I'll coordinate the work and collect
patches for the team.
If you have comments on this, or if you know about some omissi
13 matches
Mail list logo
