On 06/23/2011 11:24 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
I don't know that we're hearing that all vendor trees want to be on the
latest kernel. What I'm reading from Andy's perspective is that
it is easier to just work directly against upstream changes that to
try and figure out what a
On 23 June 2011 11:39, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Andy Green wrote:
>
>> When linux-linaro-3.0 is coming in the next weeks, we will use that as a base
>> instead as before.
>
> The base will be just as good as the contributions made by people to it.
> And besides a few notable exc
Hi John,
On 24 June 2011 00:14, john stultz wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 09:04 -0700, Deepak Saxena wrote:
>> > The status is currently on linus HEAD, Panda EHCI is broken which is a bit
>> > of a downer; Jassi is taking a look at it. Also video is coming up nicely
>> > with 1080p raster, but
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 14:39 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> Half a year ago when I did ask for comments about the usefulness of the
> linaro-next tree, I got almost no responses as I suspected, and I
> therefore dropped that tree to concentrate my efforts on the Linaro
> "stable" branches. If eve
On 06/23/2011 07:39 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
I mentioned this already to npitre but for various reasons we are planning to
target 3.0 kernel rather than linux-linaro-2.6.39 at the moment. 2.6.39 has
some known issues like no onboard audio or HDMI audio, but since 3.0 has a
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 09:04 -0700, Deepak Saxena wrote:
> > The status is currently on linus HEAD, Panda EHCI is broken which is a bit
> > of a downer; Jassi is taking a look at it. Also video is coming up nicely
> > with 1080p raster, but it is stuck at 640 x 480 framebuffer viewport inside
> > t
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Andy Green wrote:
>
>> Hi -
>>
>> I mentioned this already to npitre but for various reasons we are planning to
>> target 3.0 kernel rather than linux-linaro-2.6.39 at the moment. 2.6.39 has
>> some known issues like no
On 06/23/2011 07:44 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 09:04 -0700, Deepak Saxena wrote:
The status is currently on linus HEAD, Panda EHCI is broken which is a bit
of a downer; Jassi is taking a look at it. Also video is coming up nicely
with 1080p raster, but
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Andy Green wrote:
> Hi -
>
> I mentioned this already to npitre but for various reasons we are planning to
> target 3.0 kernel rather than linux-linaro-2.6.39 at the moment. 2.6.39 has
> some known issues like no onboard audio or HDMI audio, but since 3.0 has a new
> and bet
On 06/23/2011 05:04 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
On 23 June 2011 08:51, Andy Green wrote:
Hi -
I mentioned this already to npitre but for various reasons we are planning
to target 3.0 kernel rather than linux-linaro-2.6.39 at the moment. 2.6.39
has some known issues like no
On 23 June 2011 08:51, Andy Green wrote:
> Hi -
>
> I mentioned this already to npitre but for various reasons we are planning
> to target 3.0 kernel rather than linux-linaro-2.6.39 at the moment. 2.6.39
> has some known issues like no onboard audio or HDMI audio, but since 3.0 has
> a new and be
Hi -
I mentioned this already to npitre but for various reasons we are
planning to target 3.0 kernel rather than linux-linaro-2.6.39 at the
moment. 2.6.39 has some known issues like no onboard audio or HDMI
audio, but since 3.0 has a new and better ALSA implementation for Panda
I'm not sure
12 matches
Mail list logo
