On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 17:38 +, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > > To sum it up, I am just asking you what are your plans for the linaro-next
> > > tree and
Hi Nicolas,
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 17:38 +, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > To sum it up, I am just asking you what are your plans for the linaro-next
> > tree and the operating mode we should aim for.
>
> I'm still wonderin
e merged into it.
> To sum it up, I am just asking you what are your plans for the linaro-next
> tree and the operating mode we should aim for.
I'm still wondering about that myself at the moment. Obviously, the
linaro-next is _not_ a good base for development. This is not a stable
idate code for future linaro stable
releases.
To sum it up, I am just asking you what are your plans for the linaro-next
tree and the operating mode we should aim for.
Thank you very much indeed.
Cheers,
Lorenzo
___
linaro-dev mailing list
