On 12/21/2010 2:12 AM, Loïc Minier wrote:
> Upstream faces the same problem, yet manages to move the compiler
> forward. Since Linaro's goal is for all new developments to make it
> upstream, we should simply live by upstream's standards when developing
> patches.
However, Linaro doesn't hav
On 18.12.2010 16:08, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
You may have noticed that I have created a new BZR/Launchpad branch for Linaro
GCC 4.6:
lp:gcc-linaro/4.6
https://code.launchpad.net/~linaro-toolchain-dev/gcc-linaro/4.6
Up until now, this has not been buildable due to unfixed bugs. However, upstream
G
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> I certainly understand that desire; I'm just asking how sustainable it
> is and where the commitments ought to lie. I'd just guess that this
> would be an ongoing problem, and that there will be a tension between
> "make the best possible ARM Linux syst
Dnia poniedziałek, 20 grudnia 2010 o 20:03:03 Mark Mitchell napisał(a):
> I'm not trying to take an extreme position; I'm really looking for an
> answer here. We've got something approaching 100 engineers doing
> ARM-oriented work in various components. They build on ARM, test on
> ARM, benchmar
