On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:01 AM, Michael Hope wrote:
> Hi Linus. Is this the arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc from the Ubuntu binary
> package?
It's the binary package from:
https://launchpad.net/linaro-toolchain-binaries/trunk/2012.02/+download/gcc-linaro-arm-linux-gnueabi-2012.02-20120222_linux.tar.bz2
On 03/05/2012 06:32 PM, Michael Hope wrote:
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On (06/03/12 14:50), Michael Hope wrote:
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
Hi
FWIW the backport from trunk in r106872 breaks the gcc build
Something like attached is missing from backpo
Hi,
GDB on Android:
* Spent some time understanding the intricate build process used
to compile NDK's gdbserver.
* After a lot of tinkering and trial and error I was finally able
to produce a gdbserver binary which when running on the Android
emulator and talking to a GDB (also compiled by m
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> On (06/03/12 14:50), Michael Hope wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > FWIW the backport from trunk in r106872 breaks the gcc build
>> > Something like attached is missing from backport
>>
>> Hi Khem. The fo
On (06/03/12 14:50), Michael Hope wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > FWIW the backport from trunk in r106872 breaks the gcc build
> > Something like attached is missing from backport
>
> Hi Khem. The formatter and vcvt pattern were added in r106847. The
> pa
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> Hi
>
> FWIW the backport from trunk in r106872 breaks the gcc build
> Something like attached is missing from backport
Hi Khem. The formatter and vcvt pattern were added in r106847. The
pattern was reverted in r106850 but the formatter left in.
Hi
FWIW the backport from trunk in r106872 breaks the gcc build
Something like attached is missing from backport
--
-Khem
Index: gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/config/arm/arm.c
===
--- gcc-4_6-branch.orig/gcc/config/arm/arm.c 2012-03-05 17:14
Hi Ken. In follow up to our 1-on-1 yesterday, here's what I'd like done next.
The goal is to use OE Core as a release test suite. The releases are
tarballs so we can keep the current recipe format and punt bzr support
for later. The first step is to be able to reliably build a release
in the cl
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> Hi toolchain folks,
>
> I have a problem with U-boot compiled for an ARMv4 system (Integrator)
> using Linaro 2012.02-20120222, it just crashes. Compiling the same
> U-Boot with CodeSourcery 2010-q1 works fine.
>
> Symptom:
> Resetting CPU ..
Hi there. When you do a commit that fixes a bug, try adding a
'--fixes lp:123456' to the bzr commit. Launchpad recognises these and
automatically link the branch and merge request to the bug report.
This makes it easier for the reporter to see progress. If you forget
to update the bug status (s
Hi toolchain folks,
I have a problem with U-boot compiled for an ARMv4 system (Integrator)
using Linaro 2012.02-20120222, it just crashes. Compiling the same
U-Boot with CodeSourcery 2010-q1 works fine.
Symptom:
Resetting CPU ...
undefined instruction
pc : [<07fdecd4>] lr : [<07fdeb34>]
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Richard Earnshaw
wrote:
> Number is back up, but no host...
We bounced to Ulrich's number via IRC. I've sent a please explain email.
-- Michael
___
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
http:
Merged FSF GCC 4.7 to the Linaro GCC 4.7 branch.
Merged from GCC 4.6.3 release to Linaro GCC 4.6 branch.
Wrote and posted a patch to load DImode immediate constant into NEON
registers properly. Unfortunately, testing showed a bootstrap stage 2
vs. 3 miscompare, so there's something not quite r
Number is back up, but no host...
On 5 Mar 2012, at 09:38, "Richard Earnshaw" wrote:
> Call went silent on me. Redialing is giving number unobtainable :-(
>
>
>
> On 4 Mar 2012, at 22:35, "Michael Hope" wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Peter Maydell
>> wrote:
>>> On 4 March
Call went silent on me. Redialing is giving number unobtainable :-(
On 4 Mar 2012, at 22:35, "Michael Hope" wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Peter Maydell
> wrote:
>> On 4 March 2012 22:21, Michael Hope wrote:
>>> The new conference call numbers have arrived. Let's use them f
15 matches
Mail list logo