Re: SVE routines for cortex-strings

2018-06-04 Thread Richard Henderson
On 06/04/2018 11:19 AM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote: > Yes, using cortex-strings as the bridge is indeed the preferred way. I am > asking which strategy do you see: > > - Adding ifunc variants and add them as default if system advertise SVE > support. > > - Or adding as an extra option (as

Re: SVE routines for cortex-strings

2018-06-04 Thread Adhemerval Zanella
On 04/06/2018 15:12, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 06/04/2018 11:00 AM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote: >> Do you plan to adapt them to glibc? > > Ramana suggested starting "upstream" in cortex-strings and copying to glibc > from there, as a general work-flow preference. I believe this has been the >

Re: SVE routines for cortex-strings

2018-06-04 Thread Richard Henderson
On 06/04/2018 11:00 AM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote: > Do you plan to adapt them to glibc? Ramana suggested starting "upstream" in cortex-strings and copying to glibc from there, as a general work-flow preference. I believe this has been the case for all of the other aarch64 string routines. For no

Re: SVE routines for cortex-strings

2018-06-04 Thread Adhemerval Zanella
Do you plan to adapt them to glibc? On 02/06/2018 19:46, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 06/01/2018 02:32 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote: >> Thanks for doing these. One general comment is that the routines >> tend to use the FFR result even in the case where no potential >> fault is detected. > > Tha

Re: SVE routines for cortex-strings

2018-06-04 Thread Peter Maydell
On 1 June 2018 at 18:24, Richard Henderson wrote: > [ How odd. I could find no record that the message to which you are replying > was ever actually sent. I assumed I simply closed the window instead of > hitting send. And thus I just now sent a second reply. ] Our mailing list server apparent

Re: SVE routines for cortex-strings

2018-06-04 Thread Richard Henderson
On 06/01/2018 02:32 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote: > Richard Henderson writes: >> I spoke with Ramana about these at HKG18, and I'm finally getting back to >> these. I have routines for >> >> -rw-rw-r--. 1 rth rth 2538 May 30 19:12 memchr.S >> -rw-rw-r--. 1 rth rth 2405 May 30 20:49 memcmp.S >> -rw

[ACTIVITY] Week 22

2018-06-04 Thread Yvan Roux
o LLVM * Thumbv8 bot failures [TCWG-1400]: - Fix committed upstream - Thumbv8 bots now green * Updated staging bots docker images o Misc * Various meetings and discussions. ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org