On Thursday 12 April 2012 13:53:13 Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 01:49:16PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > ia64 installs in /lib, because it isn't a multilibbed architecture.
> >
> > because distros choose not to support it. in first gen chips, t
On Thursday 12 April 2012 03:47:29 Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:33:08AM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
> > On 12 April 2012 09:05, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:22:13AM +1200, Michael Hope wrote:
> > >> All good. My vote is for /lib/ld-arm-linux-gnueabihf.s
On Thursday 12 April 2012 02:05:23 Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:22:13AM +1200, Michael Hope wrote:
> > All good. My vote is for /lib/ld-arm-linux-gnueabihf.so.3 as it:
>
> The directory should be /libhf/ or /libhfp/ for that for consistency
> with all the other architectures.
On Wednesday 11 April 2012 03:37:56 Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 23:01:47 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > one of the downsides of traveling down a path and upstreaming as an after
> > thought
>
> You didn't really follow arm hardfloat progres
On Wednesday 11 April 2012 11:25:55 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
> Probably beating a dead cow, but, the major problem with sysroots
> would be the triplet name?
>
> E.g, in any architecture:
>
> /arm-linux-gnueabi/sysroot-contents-here
it isn't really about having a sysroot the too
On Wednesday 11 April 2012 05:47:29 Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:01:47PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >On Tuesday 10 April 2012 06:42:04 Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >> * /lib/ld-linux-$triplet.so.3
> >> - could work fine, so long as we can agree
On Tuesday 10 April 2012 06:42:04 Steve McIntyre wrote:
> We understand that not everybody may want or see the need for this for
> themselves. We *really* get that. But we want it to be possible for
> *us* to do it, and an ultra-important part of that is to have unique
> loader paths wherever possi
On Tuesday 10 April 2012 00:23:09 Jeff Law wrote:
> On 04/09/2012 10:19 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Monday 09 April 2012 15:47:56 Adam Conrad wrote:
> >> To be very, very, very clea here. multilib can not solve the "different
> >> base arches on one system
On Monday 09 April 2012 15:47:56 Adam Conrad wrote:
> are you not just as much hindering Debian over nothing more than a path to a
> single file?
nope. sounds more like self inflicted pain.
> To be very, very, very clea here. multilib can not solve the "different
> base arches on one system pro
On Thursday 05 April 2012 05:06:43 Riku Voipio wrote:
> On 5 April 2012 04:18, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Tuesday 03 April 2012 04:06:01 Riku Voipio wrote:
> >> The choice of using multiarch path for armhf linker path was agreed
> >> mostly because 1) people agreed tha
On Wednesday 04 April 2012 22:48:34 Wookey wrote:
> Mike Frysinger [2012-04-02 19:56 -0400]:
> > >>> i agree that the ldso needs changing to something unique so everyone
> > >>> can start off on the same page with a sane path. i don't think
> > >>
On Wednesday 04 April 2012 21:31:20 dann frazier wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 09:18:13PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Tuesday 03 April 2012 04:06:01 Riku Voipio wrote:
> > > On 3 April 2012 02:56, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Apr 2, 2012
On Tuesday 03 April 2012 04:06:01 Riku Voipio wrote:
> On 3 April 2012 02:56, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 17:15, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >> yes, this was brought up at Linaro Connect as well; having the ldso name
> >> in a multiarch location does
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 17:15, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 02.04.2012 21:46, Jon Masters wrote:
>> On 04/02/2012 03:04 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 09:19, Riku Voipio wrote:
>>>> On 31 March 2012 19:52, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>>>
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 09:19, Riku Voipio wrote:
> On 31 March 2012 19:52, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>> Linaro Connect and other events are probably the worst place for such
>> decisions and discussions to be made. though maybe there is not a good
>> place. the wider community needs to be engaged for
15 matches
Mail list logo
