On 02/10/2023 18:12, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
Hi Ramana,
I used --target=arm-none-linux-gnueabihf --host=arm-none-linux-gnueabihf
--build=arm-none-linux-gnueabihf --with-float=hard. However it seems that the
default armhf settings are incorrect. I shouldn't need the --with-float=hard
since
tha
UNSPEC_LDR ; Represent a load-register-relaxed.
> >> + VUNSPEC_LDA ; Represent a load-register-acquire.
> >
> > Nit: LDA before LDR ? Though I suspect this list can be alphabetically
> > ordered at another point of time.
>
> Swapped.
Thanks
&g
> On Oct 1, 2023, at 00:36, Ramana Radhakrishnan
> wrote:
>
> + linaro-toolchain as I don't understand the CI issues on patchwork.
>
>
...
> Ok if no regressions but as you might get nagged by the post commit CI ...
I don't see any pre-commit failures for this patch, but regardless of what
r
Hi Ramana,
>> I used --target=arm-none-linux-gnueabihf --host=arm-none-linux-gnueabihf
>> --build=arm-none-linux-gnueabihf --with-float=hard. However it seems that the
>> default armhf settings are incorrect. I shouldn't need the --with-float=hard
>> since
>> that is obviously implied by armhf, a
