RE: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 6% after llvm: Allow rematerialization of virtual reg uses

2021-09-30 Thread Mekhanoshin, Stanislav
Message- From: Maxim Kuvyrkov Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 12:06 To: Mekhanoshin, Stanislav Cc: linaro-toolchain Subject: Re: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 6% after llvm: Allow rematerialization of virtual reg uses [CAUTION: External Email] Hi Stanislav, That's fair;

RE: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 6% after llvm: Allow rematerialization of virtual reg uses

2021-09-30 Thread Mekhanoshin, Stanislav
bject: Re: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 6% after llvm: Allow rematerialization of virtual reg uses [CAUTION: External Email] Hi Stanislav, Attached is a tarball with -save-temps output (pre-processed source and generated assembly) for first-bad run (your commit) and last-good run (imme

RE: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 6% after llvm: Allow rematerialization of virtual reg uses

2021-09-30 Thread Mekhanoshin, Stanislav
, Stanislav Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 12:09 To: Maxim Kuvyrkov Cc: linaro-toolchain Subject: RE: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 6% after llvm: Allow rematerialization of virtual reg uses I assume some of the newly rematerialized instructions caused perf drops. Probably some very specific

RE: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 6% after llvm: Allow rematerialization of virtual reg uses

2021-09-30 Thread Mekhanoshin, Stanislav
, Stanislav Cc: linaro-toolchain Subject: Re: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 6% after llvm: Allow rematerialization of virtual reg uses [CAUTION: External Email] Hi Stanislav, FYI, your patch seems to be slowing down two of SPEC CPU2006 tests on 32-bit ARM at -O2 and -O3 optimization

Re: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 6% after llvm: Allow rematerialization of virtual reg uses

2021-09-30 Thread Maxim Kuvyrkov
> report. > > Stas > > From: Mekhanoshin, Stanislav > Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021 11:48 > To: Maxim Kuvyrkov > Cc: linaro-toolchain > Subject: RE: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 6% after llvm: Allow > rematerialization of virtual reg uses > >

Re: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 6% after llvm: Allow rematerialization of virtual reg uses

2021-09-30 Thread Maxim Kuvyrkov
t; Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 12:09 > To: Maxim Kuvyrkov > Cc: linaro-toolchain > Subject: RE: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 6% after llvm: Allow > rematerialization of virtual reg uses > > I assume some of the newly rematerialized instructions caused perf drops. >

Re: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 6% after llvm: Allow rematerialization of virtual reg uses

2021-09-30 Thread Maxim Kuvyrkov
vyrkov > Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2021 5:52 > To: Mekhanoshin, Stanislav > Cc: linaro-toolchain > Subject: Re: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 6% after llvm: Allow > rematerialization of virtual reg uses > > [CAUTION: External Email] > > Hi Stanislav, > &g

Re: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 6% after llvm: Allow rematerialization of virtual reg uses

2021-09-22 Thread Maxim Kuvyrkov
Maxim Kuvyrkov > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 5:16 > To: Mekhanoshin, Stanislav > Cc: linaro-toolchain > Subject: Re: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 6% after llvm: Allow > rematerialization of virtual reg uses > > [CAUTION: External Email] > > Hi Stanislav

Re: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 6% after llvm: Allow rematerialization of virtual reg uses

2021-09-15 Thread Maxim Kuvyrkov
Hi Stanislav, FYI, your patch seems to be slowing down two of SPEC CPU2006 tests on 32-bit ARM at -O2 and -O3 optimization levels. -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > On 15 Sep 2021, at 12:54, ci_not...@linaro.org wrote: > > After llvm commit 92c1fd19abb15bc68b1127a26137a69e033cdb39 > A