Re: 2010-10-04 Toolchain WG minutes

2010-10-06 Thread Michael Hope
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Yao Qi wrote: > On 10/06/2010 05:38 AM, Michael Hope wrote: > | Open sessions: > |  We have a few at lin...@uds > > Where can I find them? http://summit.ubuntu.com/uds-n/ doesn't give me > much information on lin...@uds.  I assume that sessions or topics are > liste

Re: 2010-10-04 Toolchain WG minutes

2010-10-05 Thread Yao Qi
On 10/06/2010 05:38 AM, Michael Hope wrote: > ...are available here: > https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/Meetings/2010-10-04 > > A recording of the call is available here: > http://tc.seabright.co.nz/toolchainwg/ > > Interesting topics include a discussion on the copyright and lic

Re: 2010-10-04 Toolchain WG minutes

2010-10-05 Thread Mark Mitchell
On 10/5/2010 8:11 PM, Zach Welch wrote: > No, this problem derives from the mess of intellectual property laws > that must be respected in order to preserve the integrity of the myriad > of projects that want to be using this code, while still allowing all future > improvements to flow seamless be

Re: 2010-10-04 Toolchain WG minutes

2010-10-05 Thread Zach Welch
Sorry, I should clarify my earlier post. I did not mean to insinuate that ARM (or their lawyers) have created this problem. However, they are the author's and copyright holders of the code in question. Nico asked specifically about the FSF assignment, and my answer was aimed at that specific situa

Re: 2010-10-04 Toolchain WG minutes

2010-10-05 Thread Nicolas Pitre
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, Michael Hope wrote: > Ah, there's all types of things going on here. It's an unusual one as > string routines such as memcpy() are fundamental and self contained > and pointless to reimplement. I want to share them almost as a gift, > usable by anyone under any terms and, ide

Re: 2010-10-04 Toolchain WG minutes

2010-10-05 Thread Michael Hope
Ah, there's all types of things going on here. It's an unusual one as string routines such as memcpy() are fundamental and self contained and pointless to reimplement. I want to share them almost as a gift, usable by anyone under any terms and, ideally, to allow third party improvements to be fre

Re: 2010-10-04 Toolchain WG minutes

2010-10-05 Thread Zach Welch
On 10/05/2010 06:35 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > From the minutes: > > | * ARM wish to keep rights for anything ARM produces, perhaps > | through back grant > | * Future code will be done by Linaro, so by others > | * Issue is with copyright instead of license > | * MIT/X11 do

Re: 2010-10-04 Toolchain WG minutes

2010-10-05 Thread Nicolas Pitre
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, Michael Hope wrote: > ...are available here: > https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/Meetings/2010-10-04 > > A recording of the call is available here: > http://tc.seabright.co.nz/toolchainwg/ > > Interesting topics include a discussion on the copyright and licens

2010-10-04 Toolchain WG minutes

2010-10-05 Thread Michael Hope
...are available here: https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/Meetings/2010-10-04 A recording of the call is available here: http://tc.seabright.co.nz/toolchainwg/ Interesting topics include a discussion on the copyright and license issues on string routines, the upcoming 2010.10 relea