Re: Basic benchmarks

2010-09-08 Thread Michael Hope
All better now. I've also added OGG Vorbis encode/decode tests and bzip2 compress/decompress tests and expanded the number of runs. Over the next week I'll look at re-running the 4.4.4 and 4.5.1 builds to create a baseline. -- Michael On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 8:59 PM, Michael Hope wrote: > Ah, t

Re: Basic benchmarks

2010-09-08 Thread Michael Hope
Ah, this is from me mucking about on a live server. Will fix. -- Michael On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 8:51 PM, Loïc Minier wrote: > On Wed, Sep 08, 2010, Michael Hope wrote: >> See http://ex.seabright.co.nz/helpers/benchcompare for more. > >   at /helpers/benchcompare > >  values is an empty list whe

Re: Basic benchmarks

2010-09-08 Thread Loïc Minier
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010, Michael Hope wrote: > See http://ex.seabright.co.nz/helpers/benchcompare for more. at /helpers/benchcompare values is an empty list when calling square() in templates/benchcompare.html; the web backtrace seems off by some lines for some reason -- Loïc Minier

Re: Basic benchmarks

2010-09-07 Thread Yao Qi
Michael Hope wrote: > I've been checking over the benchmarks as a lead up to the 2010.09 > release. We're in a good way compared to both 4.4.4 and 4.5.1 for > most non-trivial tests. > * pybench is 10.9 % faster than 4.4.4 and 7.7 % faster than 4.5.1. > * linpack is 46.4 % faster than 4.4.4 and

Basic benchmarks

2010-09-07 Thread Michael Hope
I've been checking over the benchmarks as a lead up to the 2010.09 release. We're in a good way compared to both 4.4.4 and 4.5.1 for most non-trivial tests. * pybench is 10.9 % faster than 4.4.4 and 7.7 % faster than 4.5.1. * linpack is 46.4 % faster than 4.4.4 and the same as 4.5.1. * ffmpeg h