Re: Testsuite differences with a hard float shift

2012-05-22 Thread Michael Hope
On 22 May 2012 17:34, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 17.05.2012 10:29, Michael Hope wrote: >> sorry, unimplemented: Thumb-1 hard-float VFP ABI errors: tests where >> they set the architecture to ARMv5T and use our default Thumb mode. >> This causes the compiler to fail as it doesn't support Thumb-1 wi

Re: Testsuite differences with a hard float shift

2012-05-21 Thread Matthias Klose
On 17.05.2012 10:29, Michael Hope wrote: > sorry, unimplemented: Thumb-1 hard-float VFP ABI errors: tests where > they set the architecture to ARMv5T and use our default Thumb mode. > This causes the compiler to fail as it doesn't support Thumb-1 with > hard float. can these test cases be adjusted

Re: Testsuite differences with a hard float shift

2012-05-17 Thread Michael Hope
On 17 May 2012 18:23, Zhenqiang Chen wrote: >> Some are marked as unsupported but shouldn't be: >> >> +UNSUPPORTED: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-11a.c >> +UNSUPPORTED: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-11b.c >> +UNSUPPORTED: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-11.c >> +UNSUPPORTED: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-11c.c >> +UNSU

Testsuite differences with a hard float shift

2012-05-16 Thread Michael Hope
Hi Zhenqiang. I've had a look at the difference between testsuite results on our current softfp Natty builders and the new hard float Precise builders. The diff and notes is at: http://people.linaro.org/~michaelh/incoming/hard-float-builder-diff.txt There's a lot of commonality: /usr/bin/ld: c