On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 3:46 PM Karla Gravis wrote:
> Utile and the HCAWG would not submit proposals that don’t satisfy the
> letter of the law. Options D have been blessed by both parties. Options E
> offer a combination of approved parcels already existing in Options C and
> Ds.
>
> Options D a
That definition of bus station quoted below is
*NOT in the law*. That definition quoted below is in *the guidelines the
EOHLC created*. The law itself just says “bus station”.
*We need to be consistent*. If the argument being made is that we don’t
believe the guidelines, then a bus station is a bu
k] Letter of the Law, was November 21st meeting -
> question
> To: LincolnTalk.org
>
>
> Several recent posts have stated that the proposed E options would satisfy
> the letter of the law. That is not correct. None of the E or D options
> comply with the actual Sect 3A law:
&g
Several recent posts have stated that the proposed E options would satisfy
the letter of the law. That is not correct. None of the E or D options
comply with the actual Sect 3A law:
*An MBTA community shall have a zoning ordinance or by-law that provides
for at least 1 district of reasonable siz
