] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alex da Franca
Sent: 11 April 2005 23:12
To: Lingo programming discussion list
Subject: Re: lingo-l joining lists in lingo
Am 11.04.2005 um 23:42 schrieb Buzz Kettles:
I was going to mention this aspect too, but figured the performance
difference
Am 12.04.2005 um 10:16 schrieb Tim Welford:
I don't particularly dislike repeat loops, I was just wondering if
there was a more efficient way.
let me rephrase it in another way: what leads you to the assumption,
that a repeat loop is inefficient ?
I think I am going to investigate the pRegEx
Hello Tim,
You can do it by appending list two to list one, by using a loop and getAt(),
getPropAt(), addProp() and addAt() methods.
repeat with i = 1 to list2.count()
addProp(list1, getAt(list2, i)
end repeat
i'm not exatcly sure of the syntax, however, it clearly should give you an idea.
Of Ozkan
ALTUNER
Sent: 11 April 2005 13:15
To: Lingo programming discussion list
Subject: Re: lingo-l joining lists in lingo
Hello Tim,
You can do it by appending list two to list one, by using a loop and
getAt(), getPropAt(), addProp() and addAt() methods.
repeat with i = 1 to list2.count
April 2005 13:15
To: Lingo programming discussion list
Subject: Re: lingo-l joining lists in lingo
Hello Tim,
You can do it by appending list two to list one, by using a loop and
getAt(), getPropAt(), addProp() and addAt() methods.
repeat with i = 1 to list2.count()
addProp(list1, getAt(list2, i
programming discussion list
Subject: Re: lingo-l joining lists in lingo
Hello Tim,
You can do it by appending list two to list one, by using a loop and
getAt(), getPropAt(), addProp() and addAt() methods.
repeat with i = 1 to list2.count()
addProp(list1, getAt(list2, i)
end repeat
i'm
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ozkan
ALTUNER
Sent: 11 April 2005 13:15
To: Lingo programming discussion list
Subject: Re: lingo-l joining lists in lingo
Hello Tim,
You can do it by appending list two to list one, by using a loop and
getAt(), getPropAt(), addProp
On Apr 11, 2005, at 8:54 AM, Buzz Kettles wrote:
While the below looks good, doing the 2 list-to-string conversions
make that approach much slower than repeat-and-append.
hth
-Buzz
Also it would fail with large lists. String to list fails if the list
has more than 32768 entries.
rj
[To remove
rid of the repeat loop and hence improve the efficiency of
the code.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ozkan
ALTUNER
Sent: 11 April 2005 13:15
To: Lingo programming discussion list
Subject: Re: lingo-l joining lists
Am 11.04.2005 um 23:42 schrieb Buzz Kettles:
I was going to mention this aspect too, but figured the performance
difference was enough of a good enough reason.
after all I don't quite understand, what is so bad about the little
repeat loop.
I for one like repeat loops... ;-)
if only I could
At 12:11 AM +0200 4/12/05, you wrote:
Am 11.04.2005 um 23:42 schrieb Buzz Kettles:
I was going to mention this aspect too, but figured the performance
difference was enough of a good enough reason.
after all I don't quite understand, what is so bad about the little
repeat loop.
I for one like
11 matches
Mail list logo