Hi all,
I am creating a project that needs to switch the resolution of the display
to 800x600. I was trying a few xtras but then realized that Buddy API
supports that function.
However no matter when I call the function (exitframe, startMovie or
prepareMovie) the stage is no longer centered. The
if your movie is also 800x600
window(stage) = the desktoprectlist[1]
should do it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Greg Lippert
Sent: 17 September 2004 17:27
To: [EMAIL
Nevermind,
I got it to work by creating a new stub movie with nothing on the stage that
jumps to my first movie with data. The way it calls things seems to have
solved the problem.
Thanks,
Greg
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
I don't know if it is Maya (the exporter) or Director that does not work
properly. From my experience it is most likely Director because i
experience new bugs every day ...
I just want to excuse me for being so unfriendly to the macromedia team.
Today I found the time to browse the list archive
Greg:
Really a bad idea to start switching monitor resolutions - is there a
specific reason for this?
Ross
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL
On Sep 17, 2004, at 12:51 PM, Ross Clutterbuck wrote:
Really a bad idea to start switching monitor resolutions -
That isn't always the case. Depends on the audience. In my case, I make
a lot of kiosks which get run on rental PCs, and set up by on-site
staff. The more the software can do to
I've been a leave the user's monitor alone fer chrissakes person, too,
but I have come to learn that there is a time for if-then-else and a time
for case,
a time for strings and a time for symbols,
a time for And/Or and a time for bitxor,
a time for cross-platform and a time for using those
Lutz Paelike wrote:
But Director looks more and more like a semi-abandoned piece of software.
I think there are two possibilities:
- putting more effort(=money,developers,support) into director like
flash gets
- or shutting it down and concentrating on a migration path to flash
I agree with
I'm using Dir MX (not 2004) with MacOS 10.3.4.
I went to use the Memory Inspector and could not find it. I looked up
the manual and it says it should be under Window/Memory Inspector. The
Help says the same but it is not there. And I cannot see it anywhere
else.
There is no memory inspector on
I think the blanket Really a bad idea is a rather misleading guideline
that is only appropriate for developers that don't deal with all the
considerations. There are situations, even when something is
distributed to the public, when desktop environment resetting is
appropriate if handled
the below was copy/pasted from one of the other DIR lists:
Developers,
Today Macromedia announces a comprehensive update to both Macromedia
Director and the Shockwave Player. This update includes a wide variety of
changes to both
All,
the below was copy/pasted from one of the other DIR lists:
Developers,
Today Macromedia announces a comprehensive update to both Macromedia
Director and the Shockwave Player.
Thanks Buzz, I did post the announcement
At 11:54 AM -0700 9/17/04, you wrote:
All,
the below was copy/pasted from one of the other DIR lists:
Developers,
Today Macromedia announces a comprehensive update to both Macromedia
Director and the Shockwave Player.
Thanks
On Sep 17, 2004, at 1:26 PM, Julian Rodriguez wrote:
I agree with that. Director interface looks obsolete.
I don't think so. I like the Director interface - at least on OSX.
I can't believe Director still has only one Undo (I don't know
MX2004, but MX does).
One undo. To be honest, I rarely use
Daniel,
I would say that adhearing to make absolutely sure that ... meant just
that. If you can't ensure such then don't ;-)
On MX04 my tests so far caught such in on closeRequest. Additionally,
one xtra (Andrade Arts Resolution xtra) has an automatic reset on
shutdown, clearing global
Troy Rollins wrote:
On Sep 17, 2004, at 1:26 PM, Julian Rodriguez wrote:
I agree with that. Director interface looks obsolete.
I don't think so. I like the Director interface - at least on OSX.
I can't believe Director still has only one Undo (I don't know
MX2004, but MX does).
One undo. To be
On Sep 17, 2004, at 9:18 PM, Julian Rodriguez wrote:
Thanks for the tips. That's why I said the developers were improving
Director. But you can't deny there are quite a few things to do before
it's perfect.
Anyway, I am interested in this FLV thing... How can I encode my
videos in this format?
Thanks for the tips. That's why I said the developers were improving
Director. But you can't deny there are quite a few things to do before
it's perfect.
Anyway, I am interested in this FLV thing... How can I encode my videos
in this format?
Julian
Julian,
if you have a linux machine, you
18 matches
Mail list logo
