Sigh...
My ISP accepted to run SMUS 3.0, but when they realized it takes 98%
processor on a Windows 2000, PIII 1GHz they removed it. This is with
NO traffic at all - just running the server.
It seems odd. When I run it on a Mac on my LAN it doesn't affect the
performance of the computer at
Thanks for chicking this Neil,
The ISP stated that administering the server got considerably slower
after starting the SMUS. I'm not sure, but I _think_ they mean
administering via a www/ browser interface.
I still sounds fishy though.
-A.
I just tried it out on my own system and it does
I checked on my Mac (antique Powerbook, 500 MHz, G3). The OS lends
SMUS about 25% of CPU time, but that's not what it actually _uses_,
if i start some other applications the SMUS amount decreases.
-A.
I just tried it out on my own system and it does indeed show that it
is using 98% of the
I have had the MUS running on my own system for a couple of days at a time
with no noticeable decrease in performance of the rest of my apps running.
Typical apps running _while_ the MUS is on.
2-3 Versions of Director
Flash
IE
Netscape
Fireworks
Photoshop
3ds Max
Eudora
Lots of File Windows.
I have had the MUS running on my own system for a couple of days at
a time with no noticeable decrease in performance of the rest of my
apps running.
Typical apps running _while_ the MUS is on.
2-3 Versions of Director
Flash
IE
Netscape
Fireworks
Photoshop
3ds Max
Eudora
Lots of File Windows.
