Re: lingo-l Once more into the VOID

2002-02-21 Thread Howdy-Tzi
At 10:48 -0500 02/21/2002, Matthew DeSimone wrote: (my stack is declared on startmovie to be a linear list of 25 positions) global myStack on getStackPointer counter = 1 repeat with counter = 1 to myStack.count if myStack[counter] = 0 then

Re: lingo-l Once more into the VOID

2002-02-21 Thread Tab Julius
This would be an excellent place for you to learn to use the debugger. I will make the following comments: 1) No need to set counter=1 only to turn around and initialize it in a loop to 1. Doesn't hurt anything, just redundant. 2) There are only two exit routes from your handler. One of

RE: lingo-l Once more into the VOID

2002-02-21 Thread Matthew DeSimone
At 10:48 -0500 02/21/2002, Matthew DeSimone wrote: (my stack is declared on startmovie to be a linear list of 25 positions) global myStack on getStackPointer counter = 1 repeat with counter = 1 to myStack.count if myStack[counter] = 0 then

RE: lingo-l Once more into the VOID

2002-02-21 Thread Irv Kalb
The last line of the new handler in myScript needs to be: return me I'll bet you are missing that. Irv At 12:47 PM -0500 2/21/02, Matthew DeSimone wrote: At 10:48 -0500 02/21/2002, Matthew DeSimone wrote: (my stack is declared on startmovie to be a linear list of 25 positions)

RE: lingo-l Once more into the VOID

2002-02-21 Thread Howdy-Tzi
At 12:47 -0500 02/21/2002, Matthew DeSimone wrote: Is there something I'm missing in the parent handler itself that I should be declaring in order to make it work properly as a child? In addition to what Irv suggested (return me), make sure that the script type has been set to parent in the

RE: lingo-l Once more into the VOID

2002-02-21 Thread Matthew DeSimone
Bingo. Thank you very much. ~matt desimone [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.syrupnyc.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:lingo-l- [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Irv Kalb Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 1:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: lingo-l Once more