Re: JPEGs displayed better via Flash or Director (wasBest way to make an audio)

2001-06-18 Thread Ray Broussard
Yea, you right. Thanks for the heads up. I like that image. -Ray on 6/18/01 4:50 PM, Colin Holgate at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Ok, I've made a simple movie that shows the difference between > Director and Flash JPEG rendering. Take a look at this: > > http://staging.funnygarbage.com/colin/jpeg

Re: JPEGs displayed better via Flash or Director (wasBest way to make an audio)

2001-06-18 Thread Colin Holgate
Ok, I've made a simple movie that shows the difference between Director and Flash JPEG rendering. Take a look at this: http://staging.funnygarbage.com/colin/jpegtest.dcr Click anywhere to toggle between the two demos. The first screen looks the same, both corner images are as good as each othe

Re: JPEGs displayed better via Flash or Director (wasBest way to make an audio)

2001-06-18 Thread Colin Holgate
>1) import pre-compressed (JPEGs compressed in FW4 or debabilizer) images >into a Director cast for display, or > >2) Use Flash & Generator/Developer to create a Flash 5 SWF for each >pre-compressed image and import these SWFs into Director. One interesting thing about Flash is that it keeps the

Re: JPEGs displayed better via Flash or Director (wasBest way to make an audio)

2001-06-18 Thread the nightboy
there was something posted on flashcoders the other day about the codec that jpegs are compressed with in flash being somewhat shoddy. Brian Douglas (:ub) AS/L/JS 6'2" 170lbs. eyes:bwn hair:bwn nose hair:well groo