Colin, you've got it! The computer has been on for many weeks (it's a
server, and not used for development or testing), and after I rebooted it,
the milliseconds were positive again. Knowledge is power! Thanks,
Slava
At 10:48 PM 7/29/2001 -0400, Colin wrote:
It may be a good sign of how stable
>Thanks, Tab! That's interesting. Overflow of what? I turn on my
>computer, fire up my D8, and get an classic overflow symptom. The
>stack must be brimming, and life is getting more exciting by the
>second :-).
>
>! At 09:46 PM 7/29/2001 -0400, you wrote:
>
>>It's a classic overflow symptom, bu
Thanks, Tab! That's interesting. Overflow of what? I turn on my computer,
fire up my D8, and get an classic overflow symptom. The stack must be
brimming, and life is getting more exciting by the second :-).
! At 09:46 PM 7/29/2001 -0400, you wrote:
>It's a classic overflow symptom, but I'm not
It's a classic overflow symptom, but I'm not familiar enough with this
particular case to venture a guess.
At 09:50 PM 7/29/01 -0400, Slava Paperno wrote:
>On one of my Windows 2000 computers, (the milliseconds) is a negative
>number, growing (i.e., approaching 0) as time goes on. On another
On one of my Windows 2000 computers, (the milliseconds) is a negative
number, growing (i.e., approaching 0) as time goes on. On another WIndows
2000 computer, it's always positive. My D8 book says "the counting begins
when the computer is started" but it doesn't say it begins with 0. What's
th
