Re: lingo-l xtra problem

2001-08-21 Thread grimmwerks
Huh - well strangely enough it seems that the audio xtra never shows an instance of itself - even with that weird return, it's there with its' builtin queries. [To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to

RE: lingo-l xtra problem

2001-08-21 Thread Sean Wilson
Huh - well strangely enough it seems that the audio xtra never shows an instance of itself - even with that weird return, it's there with its' builtin queries. I'm not sure, but I think that you don't have to instantiate the audio xtra to use it - kind of like BudAPI. The commands are

RE: lingo-l xtra problem

2001-08-21 Thread Al Hospers
Huh - well strangely enough it seems that the audio xtra never shows an instance of itself - even with that weird return, it's there with its' builtin queries. like many Xtras these days, you don't have to specifically instantiate the Audio Xtra. Al Hospers CamberSoft, Inc.

RE: lingo-l xtra problem

2001-08-21 Thread grimmwerks
Well, you still have to invoke budapi as well... On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Sean Wilson wrote: Huh - well strangely enough it seems that the audio xtra never shows an instance of itself - even with that weird return, it's there with its' builtin queries. I'm not sure, but I think that you

RE: lingo-l xtra problem

2001-08-21 Thread grimmwerks
Huh - is that true? I'm no dope, but I didn't think I could use the Audio Xtras 'ax' stuff without first creating an object of it? Hmm.. On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Al Hospers wrote: like many Xtras these days, you don't have to specifically instantiate the Audio Xtra. [To remove yourself

RE: lingo-l xtra problem

2001-08-21 Thread Al Hospers
Huh - is that true? I'm no dope, but I didn't think I could use the Audio Xtras 'ax' stuff without first creating an object of it? Hmm.. the old XObjects required you to do that a few Xtras still do, but to my knowledge most do not. you just call the method. I think the ones that do so are

Re: lingo-l xtra problem

2001-08-21 Thread Nick Youmans
if I remember correctly the DirectEmail Xtra does this. I'm sure somebody will correct me if I am wrong tho... grin it sure does. DirectEmail needs to have an object declared 1st: oEmail = new(Xtra DirectEmail, getUserEmailPref(2),,) then you can do cool things, like actually sending

Re: lingo-l xtra problem

2001-08-21 Thread grimmwerks
Does the emailXtra handle attachments at all? What's everybody's choice for ftp/uploading/xtranetting files? [To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email

RE: lingo-l xtra problem

2001-08-21 Thread Mark A. Boyd
At 07:43 21/08/2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, you still have to invoke budapi as well... Not so. Buddy API's methods are available to Lingo simply by including the Xtra with the project. -- Mark A. Boyd Keep-On-Learnin' :) [To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest

RE: lingo-l xtra problem

2001-08-21 Thread Al Hospers
Does the emailXtra handle attachments at all? yes What's everybody's choice for ftp/uploading/xtranetting files? other than DirectFTP what else is there? supported that is! Al Hospers CamberSoft, Inc. alatcambersoftdotcom http://www.cambersoft.com Shockwave and Director development, Lingo

Re: RE: lingo-l xtra problem

2001-08-21 Thread Kurt
Well, you still have to invoke budapi as well... Instantiate? No, you don't - you can do it, but it's a waste of time. Because buddy's functions are global, the ba prefix is there to help differentiate the xtra's functions from lingo functions. Same goes for the audio xtra v. 4 (which is a