Re: [LINK] FTTN notes

2016-03-23 Thread Paul Brooks
On 21/03/2016 7:44 AM, Tom Worthington wrote: > On 20/03/16 14:41, Paul Brooks wrote: > >> Pedantic - its a "voice service" ... > > Is it a voice telephony service under the Telecommunications Act? > > There are obligations on the providers of voice telephony services, for > example with > Triple

Re: [LINK] "Broadband" service to not-very-remote premises

2016-03-23 Thread David Boxall
Forgot the link: ___ Link mailing list Link@mailman.anu.edu.au http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link

Re: [LINK] "Broadband" service to not-very-remote premises

2016-03-23 Thread David Boxall
On 24/03/2016 10:18 AM, JanW wrote: At 09:23 AM 24/03/2016, David Boxall wrote: The story of another business and family blighted by our degraded telecommunications infrastructure. I wonder where we would be, but for privatisation. Would we need an NBN project or would we already have

Re: [LINK] "Broadband" service to not-very-remote premises

2016-03-23 Thread JanW
At 09:23 AM 24/03/2016, David Boxall wrote: >The story of another business and family blighted by our degraded >telecommunications infrastructure. I wonder where we would be, but for >privatisation. Would we need an NBN project or would we already have >infrastructure for the 21st century? I

Re: [LINK] DD & NBN

2016-03-23 Thread David Lochrin
On 2016-03-22 08:16 Andy Farkas wrote: > There are many political points to score by Labor from what Turnbull/Abbott > have done to the NBN/MTM. Most of the problems arising from the MTM strategy are technical & strategic which isn't easy to get across to an electorate, particularly when most

[LINK] "Broadband" service to not-very-remote premises

2016-03-23 Thread David Boxall
The story of another business and family blighted by our degraded telecommunications infrastructure. I wonder where we would be, but for privatisation. Would we need an NBN project or would we already have infrastructure for the 21st century?

Re: [LINK] Sneakernet rules

2016-03-23 Thread Bernard Robertson-Dunn
On the other hand, sometimes using sneakernet is the best solution to a difficult problem. Unless of course you are North Korea, in which case it's a problem of its own: http://www.abc.net.au/triplej/programs/hack/north-korea-usbs/7267572 http://www.flashdrivesforfreedom.org/ -- Regards brd