On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 10:04:06AM +1000, Jim Birch wrote:
> Suppose, for example, the government billed anyone without a MyHR record the
> full cost of unnecessary duplicate tests, would this change attitudes.
That sounds like coercion, and punishment of those who exercise their right to
opt
I wrote that APF quote at the bottom, a while ago. I also wrote these,
more recently.
https://privacy.org.au/campaigns/myhr/for-sale-your-privacy-and-your-health-data/
https://privacy.org.au/campaigns/myhr/opt-out-of-my-health-record/the-truth-about-my-health-record/
On Thursday, 19 July 2018 15:44:43 AEST Jim Birch wrote:
> This is the version 1.0 product.
It's actually V2.0. The AMA published this press release on 15th Oct 2015:
"The Government has proposed that Practice Incentive Program e-health payments
be tied to doctor use of the MyHealth Record
On Thursday, 19 July 2018 16:24:13 AEST Karl Auer wrote:
> But it has to be done the right way. Setting up a massive, poorly controlled,
> poorly secured, poorly managed and poorly curated helth database on all
> Australians is not the way. It's not just a V1.0 problem, it is a
> fundamentally
On 19/07/2018 3:44 PM, Jim Birch wrote:
This is the version 1.0 product. ...
Looks more like an alpha to me. Making a half-baked system opt-out
smacks of desperation.
First Dog speaks:
On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 15:44 +1000, Jim Birch wrote:
> This is the version 1.0 product.
Yep. And Rule Number One is, never deploy v1.0.
> Declaring that it is no use and never will be seems perhaps a little
> too grandiose to me.
That's a straw man. MyHR's usefulness is certainly in serious
