Yeah, I noticed it wasn't just me so I wasn't too worried. I just assumed
because I'm new I haven't been marked at "trusted" by the gmail users.
>person who runs 0744.ca has it DKIM-sign his mail (I assume from the name
>Andrew that it's a male...)
Yup, that's me :)
Andrew.
On January 31,
On Sat, 30 Jan 2021 21:12:25 -0500
Dianne Skoll wrote:
> so the DKIM signature was not valid. I don't see that the mailing
> list did anything untoward, so perhaps the originator's DKIM signature
> isn't valid for some reason?
Ah, no... it's the mailing list software. The footer added at the b
On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 20:34:51 -0500
Kevin Szabo wrote:
> Thanks for everyone's ideas on the gmail algorithm choking on the
> non-spam message. If anyone wants to look at the headers etc of the
> mailing-list message that was misidentified as spam by Gmail, I have
> downloaded it and can send it to
See
https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2021/01/cell-phone-location-privacy.html
"“Pretty Good Phone Privacy” (PGPP) protects both user identity and user
location using the
existing cellular networks. It protects users from fake cell phone towers
(IMSI-catchers) and
surveillance b
Hi. I've been on the linux list awhile, but I haven't participated that
much, I haven't gotten out to any of the meetings in awhile. I've played
with linux, but still use windows a fair bit (and recently, chrome os, not
developer mode or modded nor with google play store active, which gives
some o
Thanks for everyone's ideas on the gmail algorithm choking on the non-spam
message. If anyone wants to look at the headers etc of the mailing-list
message that was misidentified as spam by Gmail, I have downloaded it and
can send it to you or I can send it to the mailing list (it isn't big).
On Tu